Performance of a Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential and Eye Gaze Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface on Participants With and Without a Brain Injury

被引:10
作者
Brennan, Chris [1 ]
McCullagh, Paul [1 ]
Lightbody, Gaye [1 ]
Galway, Leo [1 ]
McClean, Sally [1 ]
Stawicki, Piotr [2 ]
Gembler, Felix [2 ]
Volosyak, Ivan [2 ]
Armstrong, Elaine [3 ]
Thompson, Eileen [3 ]
机构
[1] Ulster Univ, Comp Sci Res Inst, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, North Ireland
[2] Rhein Waal Univ Appl Sci, Dept Biomed & Engn, D-47533 Kleve, Germany
[3] Cedar Fdn, Belfast BT9 6HL, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
Electroencephalography; Visualization; Navigation; Brain injuries; Electrodes; Assistive technology; Collaboration; Brain-computer interface (BCI); brain injury (BI); data fusion; eye tracking; virtual environment; BCI; REAL;
D O I
10.1109/THMS.2020.2983661
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The brain-computer interface (BCI) and the tracking of eye gaze provide modalities for human-machine communication and control. In this article, we provide the evaluation of a collaborative BCI and eye gaze approach, known as a hybrid BCI. The combined inputs interact with a virtual environment to provide actuation according to a four-way menu system. The following two approaches are evaluated: first, steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP) BCI with on-screen stimulation; second, hybrid BCI, which combined eye gaze and SSVEP for navigation and selection. A study comprises participants without known brain injury (non-BI, N = 30) and participants with known brain injury (BI, N = 14). A total of 29 out of 30 non-BI participants can successfully control the hybrid BCI, while nine out of the 14 BI participants are able to achieve control, as evidenced by task completion. The hybrid BCI provides a mean accuracy of 99.84% in the cohort of non-BI participants and 99.14% in the cohort of BI participants. Information transfer rates are 24.41 bpm in non-BI participants and 15.87 bpm in BI participants. The research goal is to quantify usage of SSVEP and ET approaches in cohorts of non-BI and BI participants. The hybrid is the preferred interaction modality for most participants for both cohorts. When compared to non-BI participants, it is encouraging that nine out of 14 participants with known BI can use the hBCI technology with equivalent accuracy and efficiency, albeit with slower transfer rates.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 286
页数:10
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Towards an independent brain-computer interface using steady state visual evoked potentials [J].
Allison, Brendan. Z. ;
McFarland, Dennis J. ;
Schalk, Gerwin ;
Zheng, Shi Dong ;
Jackson, Melody Moore ;
Wolpaw, Jonathan R. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2008, 119 (02) :399-408
[2]   A Review of Hybrid Brain-Computer Interface Systems [J].
Amiri, Setare ;
Fazel-Rezai, Reza ;
Asadpour, Vahid .
ADVANCES IN HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2013, 2013
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, HDB DIGITAL GAMES EN
[4]  
BNCI Horizon 2020, 2015, ROADM FUT BRAIN NEUR
[5]   Design and Evaluation of Fusion Approach for Combining Brain and Gaze Inputs for Target Selection [J].
Evain, Andeol ;
Argelaguet, Ferran ;
Casiez, Gery ;
Roussel, Nicolas ;
Lecuyer, Anatole .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 10
[6]   Spelling with steady-state visual evoked Potentials [J].
Friman, Ola ;
Lueth, Thorsten ;
Volosyak, Ivan ;
Graeser, Axel .
2007 3RD INTERNATIONAL IEEE/EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, :354-+
[7]   Multiple channel detection of steady-state visual evoked potentials for brain-computer interfaces [J].
Friman, Ola ;
Volosyak, Ivan ;
Graeser, Axel .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 54 (04) :742-750
[8]   BCI and Eye Gaze: Collaboration at the Interface [J].
Galway, Leo ;
Brennan, Chris ;
McCullagh, Paul ;
Lightbody, Gaye .
FOUNDATIONS OF AUGMENTED COGNITION, AC 2015, 2015, 9183 :199-210
[9]   Autonomous Parameter Adjustment for SSVEP-Based BCIs with a Novel BCI Wizard [J].
Gembler, Felix ;
Stawicki, Piotr ;
Volosyak, Ivan .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2015, 9