Business excellence models: limitations, reflections and further development

被引:77
作者
Dahlgaard, Jens J. [1 ]
Chen, Chi-Kuang [2 ]
Jang, Jiun-Yi [2 ]
Banegas, Leonardo A. [2 ]
Dahlgaard-Park, Su Mi [3 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Yuan Ze Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Zhongli City, Taiwan
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Serv Management, Lund, Sweden
关键词
business excellence models; total quality management; 4P excellence model; MBNQA; EFQM excellence model; self-assessment; change management; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; PERFORMANCE; FRAMEWORK; AWARDS; IMPLEMENTATION; VALUES;
D O I
10.1080/14783363.2012.756745
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The use of business excellence models (BEM) has become popular in the last two decades, and several companies have learned how to use them and gained from such models. More companies, we assume, have experienced problems when using such models because of various weaknesses such as too-sophisticated assessment criteria, excessive paperwork, cumbersome procedures and a lack of focus, which have limited its use in practice. To respond to some of those problems, a new overall business excellence framework (BEF) has been developed which recommends adaption instead of adoption of existing BEM. The suggested overall BEF helps to integrate BEM with management tools/techniques and the organisational culture/characteristics for guiding an organisation towards business excellence. A document-based empirical case of a world-class company, Boeing Aerospace Support, was investigated to illustrate how the overall BEF may work in practice as a complement to an existing BEM when companies adapt such models to their specific contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 538
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Value-based total performance excellence model: A conceptual framework for organisations
    Abdullah, Mokhtar
    Ab Hamid, Mohd Rashid
    Mustafa, Zainol
    Husain, Nooreha
    Idris, Fazli
    Suradi, Nur Riza Mohd
    Ismail, Wan Rosmanira
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2012, 23 (5-6) : 557 - 572
  • [2] Including sustainability in business excellence models
    Asif, Muhammad
    Searcy, Cory
    Garvare, Rickard
    Ahmad, Niaz
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2011, 22 (07) : 773 - 786
  • [3] Total quality beyond North America A comparative analysis of the performance of European Excellence Award winners
    Boulter, Louise
    Bendell, Tony
    Dahlgaard, Jens
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2013, 33 (1-2) : 197 - 215
  • [4] Development of a simplified approach based on the EFQM model and Six Sigma for the implementation of TQM principles in a university administration
    Campatelli, Gianni
    Citti, Paolo
    Meneghin, Andrea
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2011, 22 (07) : 691 - 704
  • [5] Chapman C., 2000, QUALITY WORLD, V26, P30
  • [6] Collins J., 2019, TURNING FLYWHEEL MON
  • [7] Business excellence in New Zealand: continuous improvement, learning, and change
    Corbett, Lawrence M.
    Angell, Linda C.
    [J]. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2011, 22 (07) : 755 - 772
  • [8] Validating the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award Framework through structural equation modelling
    Curkovic, S
    Melnyk, S
    Calantone, R
    Handfield, R
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2000, 38 (04) : 765 - 791
  • [9] Dahlgaard J.J., 2004, EUROPEAN QUALITY, V10, P6
  • [10] Dahlgaard J.J., 1998, FUNDAMENTALS TOTAL Q