Mortality difference between early-identified sepsis and late-identified sepsis

被引:9
作者
Jee, Woon [1 ]
Jo, Sion [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lee, Jae Baek [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jin, Youngho [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Jeong, Taeoh [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yoon, Jae Chol [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Park, Boyoung [5 ]
机构
[1] Chonbuk Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Jeonju, South Korea
[2] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Dept Emergency Med, Med Sch, Jeonju, South Korea
[3] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Res Inst Clin Med, Jeonju, South Korea
[4] Chonbuk Natl Univ Hosp, Biomed Res Inst, Jeonju, South Korea
[5] Hanyang Univ, Dept Med, Coll Med, Seoul, South Korea
来源
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL EMERGENCY MEDICINE | 2020年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
Sepsis; Mortality; Shock; septic; INTERNATIONAL CONSENSUS DEFINITIONS; FAILURE ASSESSMENT SCORE; ORGAN FAILURE; SEPTIC SHOCK; SOFA SCORE; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; CHOLANGITIS; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; CAMPAIGN;
D O I
10.15441/ceem.19.009
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of the study was to compare the mortality rates of patients with early-identified (EI) sepsis and late-identified (LI) sepsis. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the emergency department and diagnosed with sepsis. EI sepsis was defined as patients with a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score >= 2, based on 3 parameters of the SOFA score (Glasgow coma scale, mean arterial pressure, and partial pressure of oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio), measured within an hour of emergency department admission. The remaining patients were defined as LI sepsis. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Results Of the total 204 patients with sepsis, 113 (55.4%) had EI sepsis. Overall mortality rate was 15.7%, and EI sepsis group had significantly higher mortality than LI sepsis (23.0% vs. 6.6%, P= 0.003). The patients with EI sepsis, compared to those with LI sepsis, had higher SOFA score (median: 4 vs. 2, P< 0.001); Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score (median: 14 vs. 10, P< 0.001); were more likely to progress to septic shock within 6 hours after admission (17.7% vs. 1.1%, P< 0.001); were more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit (2.2% vs. 1.1%, P= 0.001). Conclusion Mortality was significantly higher in the EI sepsis group than in the LI sepsis group.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 160
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] BOENDER J, 1995, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V90, P233
  • [2] DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS
    BONE, RC
    BALK, RA
    CERRA, FB
    DELLINGER, RP
    FEIN, AM
    KNAUS, WA
    SCHEIN, RMH
    SIBBALD, WJ
    [J]. CHEST, 1992, 101 (06) : 1644 - 1655
  • [3] Towards complete and,accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative
    Bossuyt, PM
    Reitsma, JB
    Bruns, DE
    Gatsonis, CA
    Glasziou, PP
    Irwig, LM
    Lijmer, JG
    Moher, D
    Rennie, D
    de Vet, HCE
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7379): : 41 - 44
  • [4] Cross-validation of a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score-based model to predict mortality in patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit
    Cardenas-Turanzas, Marylou
    Ensor, Joe
    Wakefield, Chris
    Zhang, Karen
    Wallace, Susannah Kish
    Price, Kristen J.
    Nates, Joseph L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 27 (06) : 673 - 680
  • [5] Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008
    Dellinger, R. Phillip
    Levy, Mitchell M.
    Carlet, Jean M.
    Bion, Julian
    Parker, Margaret M.
    Jaeschke, Roman
    Reinhart, Konrad
    Angus, Derek C.
    Brun-Buisson, Christian
    Beale, Richard
    Calandra, Thierty
    Dhainaut, Jean-Francois
    Gerlach, Herwig
    Harvey, Maurene
    Marini, John J.
    Marshall, John
    Ranieri, Marco
    Ramsay, Graham
    Sevransky, Jonathan
    Thompson, B. Taylor
    Townsend, Sean
    Vender, Jeffrey S.
    Zimmerman, Janice L.
    Vincent, Jean-Louis
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2008, 36 (01) : 296 - 327
  • [6] Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients
    Ferreira, FL
    Bota, DP
    Bross, A
    Mélot, C
    Vincent, JL
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (14): : 1754 - 1758
  • [7] Utility of SOFA and Δ-SOFA scores for predicting outcome in critically ill patients from the emergency department
    Garcia-Gigorro, Renata
    Saez-de la Fuente, Ignacio
    Mateos, Helena Marin
    Andres-Esteban, Eva M.
    Sanchez-Izquierdo, Jose A.
    Montejo-Gonzalez, Juan C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 25 (06) : 387 - 393
  • [8] Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods?
    Gilbert, EH
    Lowenstein, SR
    KoziolMcLain, J
    Barta, DC
    Steiner, J
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1996, 27 (03) : 305 - 308
  • [9] Decreasing Mortality From Acute Biliary Diseases That Require Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography: A Nationwide Cohort Study
    James, Paul D.
    Kaplan, Gilaad G.
    Myers, Robert P.
    Hubbard, James
    Shaheen, Abdel Aziz
    Tinmouth, Jill
    Yong, Elaine
    Love, Jonathan
    Heitman, Steven J.
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 12 (07) : 1151 - U159
  • [10] Comparison of the performance of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS for predicting mortality and organ failure among sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit in a middle-income country
    Khwannimit, Bodin
    Bhurayanontachai, Rungsun
    Vattanavanit, Veerapong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 44 : 156 - 160