Calibration Test of PET Scanners in a Multi-Centre Clinical Trial on Breast Cancer Therapy Monitoring Using 18F-FLT

被引:15
作者
Bouchet, Francis [1 ]
Geworski, Lilli [2 ,3 ]
Knoop, Bernd O. [2 ,3 ]
Ferrer, Ludovic [4 ]
Barriolo-Riedinger, Alina [5 ]
Millardet, Corinne [6 ]
Fourcade, Marjolaine [7 ]
Martineau, Antoine [8 ]
Belly-Poinsignon, Anne [9 ]
Djoumessi, Francis [10 ]
Tendero, Karine [11 ]
Keros, Laurent [12 ]
Montoya, Frederic [13 ]
Mesleard, Christel [14 ]
Martin, Anne-Laure [14 ]
Lacoeuille, Franck [1 ,15 ]
Couturier, Olivier [1 ,15 ]
机构
[1] Acad Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Angers, France
[2] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Radiat Protect, Hannover, Germany
[3] Hannover Med Sch, Dept Med Phys, Hannover, Germany
[4] R Gauducheau Canc Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Nantes, France
[5] GF Leclerc Canc Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Dijon, France
[6] J Perrin Canc Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Clermont Ferrand, France
[7] Acad Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Montpellier, France
[8] St Louis Acad Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Paris, France
[9] R Huguenin Canc Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, St Cloud, France
[10] Acad Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Tours, France
[11] Acad Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Bordeaux, France
[12] Hosp Bayonne, Dept Nucl Med, Bayonne, France
[13] Curie Canc Ctr, Dept Nucl Med, Paris, France
[14] UNICANCER, Paris, France
[15] Univ Angers, INSERM, MINT, LUNAM Univ,UMR 1066, Angers, France
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 03期
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; ROI DEFINITION; UPTAKE VALUES; STANDARDIZATION; F-18-FDG; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0058152
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A multi-centre trial using PET requires the analysis of images acquired on different systems We designed a multi-centre trial to estimate the value of 18F-FLT-PET to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. A calibration check of each PET-CT and of its peripheral devices was performed to evaluate the reliability of the results. Material and Methods: 11 centres were investigated. Dose calibrators were assessed by repeated measurements of a 68Ge certified source. The differences between the clocks associated with the dose calibrators and inherent to the PET systems were registered. The calibration of PET-CT was assessed with an homogeneous cylindrical phantom by comparing the activities per unit of volume calculated from the dose calibrator measurements with that measured on 15 Regions of Interest (ROIs) drawn on 15 consecutive slices of reconstructed filtered back-projection (FBP) images. Both repeatability of activity concentration based upon the 15 ROIs (ANOVA-test) and its accuracy were evaluated. Results: There was no significant difference for dose calibrator measurements (median of difference -0.04%; min = -4.65%; max = +5.63%). Mismatches between the clocks were less than 2 min in all sites and thus did not require any correction, regarding the half life of 18F. For all the PET systems, ANOVA revealed no significant difference between the activity concentrations estimated from the 15 ROIs (median of difference -0.69%; min = -9.97%; max = +9.60%). Conclusion: No major difference between the 11 centres with respect to calibration and cross-calibration was observed. The reliability of our 18F-FLT multi-centre clinical trial was therefore confirmed from the physical point of view. This type of procedure may be useful for any clinical trial involving different PET systems.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] A Systematic Review of the Factors Affecting Accuracy of SUV Measurements
    Adams, Michael C.
    Turkington, Timothy G.
    Wilson, Joshua M.
    Wong, Terence Z.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (02) : 310 - 320
  • [2] [18F]FLT-PET in oncology:: current status and opportunities
    Been, LB
    Suurmeijer, AJH
    Cobben, DCP
    Jager, PL
    Hoekstra, HJ
    Elsinga, PH
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 (12) : 1659 - 1672
  • [3] Boellaard R, 2004, J NUCL MED, V45, P1519
  • [4] Need for Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT for Treatment Response Assessments
    Boellaard, Ronald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52 : 93S - 100S
  • [5] FDG PET and PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour PET imaging: version 1.0
    Boellaard, Ronald
    O'Doherty, Mike J.
    Weber, Wolfgang A.
    Mottaghy, Felix M.
    Lonsdale, Markus N.
    Stroobants, Sigrid G.
    Oyen, Wim J. G.
    Kotzerke, Joerg
    Hoekstra, Otto S.
    Pruim, Jan
    Marsden, Paul K.
    Tatsch, Klaus
    Hoekstra, Corneline J.
    Visser, Eric P.
    Arends, Bertjan
    Verzijlbergen, Fred J.
    Zijlstra, Josee M.
    Comans, Emile F. I.
    Lammertsma, Adriaan A.
    Paans, Anne M.
    Willemsen, Antoon T.
    Beyer, Thomas
    Bockisch, Andreas
    Schaefer-Prokop, Cornelia
    Delbeke, Dominique
    Baum, Richard P.
    Chiti, Arturo
    Krause, Bernd J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2010, 37 (01) : 181 - 200
  • [6] Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis
    Boellaard, Ronald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 : 11S - 20S
  • [7] The Netherlands protocol for standardisation and quantification of FDG whole body PET studies in multi-centre trials
    Boellaard, Ronald
    Oyen, Wim J. G.
    Hoekstra, Corneline J.
    Hoekstra, Otto S.
    Visser, Eric P.
    Willemsen, Antoon T.
    Arends, Bertjan
    Verzijlbergen, Fred J.
    Zijlstra, Josee
    Paans, Anne M.
    Comans, Emile F. I.
    Pruim, Jan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2008, 35 (12) : 2320 - 2333
  • [8] Fluorinated tracers for imaging cancer with positron emission tomography
    Couturier, O
    Luxen, A
    Chatal, JF
    Vuillez, JP
    Rigo, P
    Hustinx, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 (08) : 1182 - 1206
  • [9] Geworski L, 2002, J NUCL MED, V43, P635
  • [10] Validating PET Scanner Calibration for Multicenter Trials
    Geworski, Lilli
    Knoop, Bernd
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 51 (06) : 997 - 998