Multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) applied to daily reference evapotranspiration modeling with limited weather data

被引:17
作者
Ferreira, Lucas Borges [1 ]
Duarte, Anunciene Barbosa [2 ]
da Cunha, Fernando Franca [1 ]
Fernandes Filho, Elpidio Inacio [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Engn Agr, Av PH Rolfs S-N,Campos Univ, BR-36570900 Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Fitotecnia, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Vicosa, Dept Solos, Vicosa, MG, Brazil
关键词
data driven; irrigation scheduling; agrometeorology; artificial intelligence; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; PENMAN-MONTEITH; CROP EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; EMPIRICAL EQUATIONS; CLIMATIC DATA; INPUT; SVM;
D O I
10.4025/actasciagron.v41i1.39880
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Estimation of reference evapotranspiration (ET omicron) is very relevant for water resource management. The Penman-Monteith (PM) equation was proposed by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) as the standard method for estimation of ET omicron. However, this method requires various weather data, such as air temperature, wind speed, solar radiation and relative humidity, which are often unavailable. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare the performance of multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS) and alternative equations, in their original and calibrated forms, to estimate daily ET omicron with limited weather data. Daily data from 2002 to 2016 from 8 Brazilian weather stations were used. ET omicron was estimated using empirical equations, PM equation with missing data and MARS. Four data availability scenarios were evaluated as follows: temperature only, temperature and solar radiation, temperature and relative humidity, and temperature and wind speed. The MARS models demonstrated superior performance in all scenarios. The models that used solar radiation showed the best performance, followed by those that used relative humidity and, finally, wind speed. The models based only on air temperature had the worst performance.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Allen R.G., 1998, IRRIGATION DRAINAGE
[2]   Worldwide assessment of the Penman-Monteith temperature approach for the estimation of monthly reference evapotranspiration [J].
Almorox, Javier ;
Senatore, Alfonso ;
Quej, Victor H. ;
Mendicino, Giuseppe .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2018, 131 (1-2) :693-703
[3]   Global performance ranking of temperature-based approaches for evapotranspiration estimation considering Koppen climate classes [J].
Almorox, Javier ;
Quej, Victor H. ;
Marti, Pau .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2015, 528 :514-522
[4]   Daily reference evapotranspiration estimates by artificial neural networks technique and empirical equations using limited input climate variables [J].
Antonopoulos, Vassilis Z. ;
Antonopoulos, Athanasios V. .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2017, 132 :86-96
[5]   Accurately predicting building energy performance using evolutionary multivariate adaptive regression splines [J].
Cheng, Min-Yuan ;
Cao, Minh-Tu .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2014, 22 :178-188
[6]   Evaluation of the Penman-Monteith (FAO 56 PM) Method for Calculating Reference Evapotranspiration Using Limited Data Application to the Wet Paramo of Southern Ecuador [J].
Cordova, Mario ;
Carrillo-Rojas, Galo ;
Crespo, Patricio ;
Wilcox, Bradford P. ;
Celleri, Rolando .
MOUNTAIN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 35 (03) :230-239
[7]  
Cunha F. F. da, 2013, Engenharia na Agricultura, V21, P159
[8]   ESTIMATION OF REFERENCE EVAPOTRANSPIRATION (ETO) UNDER FAO STANDARDS WITH MISSING CLIMATIC DATA IN MINAS GERAIS, BRAZIL [J].
de Alencar, Leonidas P. ;
Sediyama, Gilberto C. ;
Mantovani, Everardo C. .
ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA, 2015, 35 (01) :39-50
[9]  
Djaman K, 2017, J IRRIG DRAIN ENG, V143, DOI [10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001154, 10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0001154]
[10]   Calibration of Hargreaves model for reference evapotranspiration estimation in Sichuan basin of southwest China [J].
Feng, Yu ;
Jia, Yue ;
Cui, Ningbo ;
Zhao, Lu ;
Li, Chen ;
Gong, Daozhi .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2017, 181 :1-9