A Prospective Patient-centred Evaluation of Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Stricture Using a Validated Patient-reported Outcome Measure

被引:74
作者
Jackson, Matthew J. [1 ]
Chaudhury, Ishaan [2 ]
Mangera, Altaf [3 ]
Brett, Andrew [4 ]
Watkin, Nick [4 ]
Chapple, Christopher R. [3 ]
Andrich, Daniela E. [2 ]
Pickard, Robert S. [5 ]
Mundy, Anthony R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Freeman Rd Hosp, Dept Urol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7DN, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp, Inst Urol, London, England
[3] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Dept Urol, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
[4] St George Hosp, Dept Urol, London, England
[5] Newcastle Univ, Inst Cellular Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Outcome assessment (health care); Patient-reported outcome measure; Quality of life; Urethral stricture; Urethral surgery; Urethroplasty; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Studies of interventions for urethral stricture have inferred patient benefit from clinician-driven outcomes or questionnaires lacking scientifically robust evidence of their measurement properties for men with this disease. Objective: To evaluate urethral reconstruction from the patients' perspective using a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Design, setting, and participants: Forty-six men with anterior urethral stricture at four UK urology centres completed the PROM before (baseline) and 2 yr after urethroplasty. Intervention: A psychometrically robust PROM for men with urethral stricture disease. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), health status, and treatment satisfaction were measured, and paired t and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were used for comparative analysis. Results and limitations: Thirty-eight men underwent urethroplasty for bulbar stricture and eight for penile stricture. The median (range) follow-up was 25 (20-30) mo. Total LUTS scores (0 = least symptomatic, 24 = most symptomatic) improved from a median of 12 at baseline to 4 at 2 yr (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] of differences 6.6 [4.2-9.1], p < 0.0001). A total of 33 men (72%) felt their urinary symptoms interfered less with their overall quality of life, 8 (17%) reported no change, and 5 (11%) were worse 2 yr after urethroplasty. Overall, 40 men (87%) remained "satisfied'' or "very satisfied'' with the outcome of their operation. Health status visual analogue scale scores (100 = best imaginable health, 0 = worst) 2 yr after urethroplasty improved from a mean of 69 at baseline to 79 (mean [95% CI] of differences 10 [2-18], p = 0.018). Health state index scores (1 = full health, 0 = dead) improved from 0.79 at baseline to 0.89 at 2 yr (mean [95% CI] of differences 0.10 [0.02-0.18), p = 0.012]). Conclusions: This is the first study to prospectively evaluate urethral reconstruction using a validated PROM. Men reported continued relief from symptoms with related improvements in overall health status 2 yr after urethroplasty. These data can be used as a provisional reference point against which urethral surgeons can benchmark their performance. (C) 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 782
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of a patient-reported outcome measure for the foot affected by rheumatoid arthritis
    Walmsley, Steven
    Ravey, Mike
    Graham, Andrea
    Teh, Lee S.
    Williams, Anita E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (04) : 413 - 422
  • [32] Development and content validity of a hemodialysis symptom patient-reported outcome measure
    Flythe, Jennifer E.
    Dorough, Adeline
    Narendra, Julia H.
    Wingard, Rebecca L.
    Dalrymple, Lorien S.
    DeWalt, Darren A.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2019, 28 (01) : 253 - 265
  • [33] Changes in patient reported outcome measures after treatment for female urethral stricture
    Lane, Giulia I.
    Gracely, Alyssa
    Uberoi, Pansy
    Lee, Una
    Smith, Ariana L.
    Anger, Jennifer T.
    Theva, Didi
    DeLong, Jessica
    Kowalik, Casey
    Padmanabhan, Priya
    Powell, Charles R.
    Carmel, Maude E.
    Clemens, J. Quentin
    Cameron, Anne P.
    Gupta, Priyanka
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2021, 40 (04) : 986 - 993
  • [34] The Suprasellar Meningioma Patient-Reported Outcome Survey: a disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure for resection of suprasellar meningioma
    Khalafallah, Adham M.
    Rakovec, Maureen
    Burapachaisri, Katemanee
    Fung, Shirley
    Kozachik, Sharon L.
    Valappil, Benita
    Abou-Al-Shaar, Hussam
    Wang, Eric W.
    Snyderman, Carl H.
    Zenonos, Georgios A.
    Gardner, Paul A.
    Baskaya, Mustafa K.
    Dornbos, David I. I. I. I. I. I.
    Choby, Garret
    Kuan, Edward C.
    Roxbury, Christopher
    Overdevest, Jonathan B.
    Gudis, David A.
    Lee, Victoria S.
    Levy, Joshua M.
    Thamboo, Andrew
    Schlosser, Rodney J.
    Huang, Judy
    Bettegowda, Chetan
    London, Nyall R. Jr Jr
    Rowan, Nicholas R.
    Wu, Albert W.
    Mukherjee, Debraj
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 136 (06) : 1551 - 1559
  • [35] The practical reality of using a patient-reported outcome measure in a routine dermatology clinic
    Salek, Sam
    Roberts, Alaw
    Finlay, Andrew Y.
    DERMATOLOGY, 2007, 215 (04) : 315 - 319
  • [36] Patient-reported outcomes in breast oncology: a review of validated outcome instruments
    Kanatas, Anastasios
    Velikova, Galina
    Roe, Brenda
    Horgan, Kieran
    Ghazali, Naseem
    Shaw, Richard J.
    Rogers, Simon N.
    TUMORI, 2012, 98 (06) : 678 - 688
  • [37] Simplification of Validated Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Andersen, Michael J., Jr.
    Yvellez, Olivia, V
    El Jurdi, Katia
    Sossenheimer, Philip H.
    Lei, Donald
    Pearl, Talia A.
    Zmeter, Nada
    Rubin, David T.
    CROHNS & COLITIS 360, 2019, 1 (03)
  • [38] The development of PROmunication: a training-tool for clinicians using patient-reported outcomes to promote patient-centred communication in clinical cancer settings
    Skovlund, Pernille C.
    Ravn, Sissel
    Seibaek, Lene
    Thaysen, Henriette Vind
    Lomborg, Kirsten
    Nielsen, Berit Kjorside
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [39] Validation of a patient-reported outcome measure for giant cell arteritis
    Ndosi, Mwidimi
    Almeida, Celia
    Dawson, Jill
    Dures, Emma
    Greenwood, Rosemary
    Bromhead, Alison
    Guly, Catherine
    Stern, Steve
    Hill, Catherine
    Mackie, Sarah
    Robson, Joanna C.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 63 (01) : 181 - 189
  • [40] Development of a novel patient-reported outcome measure for orthognathic surgery
    Wang, Tairan
    Guo, Lei
    Zhou, Yangyifan
    Li, Gongchen
    Zhang, Xueming
    Kang, Feiwu
    Chen, Yuanwei
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2023, 138