A Prospective Patient-centred Evaluation of Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Stricture Using a Validated Patient-reported Outcome Measure

被引:74
|
作者
Jackson, Matthew J. [1 ]
Chaudhury, Ishaan [2 ]
Mangera, Altaf [3 ]
Brett, Andrew [4 ]
Watkin, Nick [4 ]
Chapple, Christopher R. [3 ]
Andrich, Daniela E. [2 ]
Pickard, Robert S. [5 ]
Mundy, Anthony R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Freeman Rd Hosp, Dept Urol, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE7 7DN, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Coll London Hosp, Inst Urol, London, England
[3] Royal Hallamshire Hosp, Dept Urol, Sheffield S10 2JF, S Yorkshire, England
[4] St George Hosp, Dept Urol, London, England
[5] Newcastle Univ, Inst Cellular Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
关键词
Outcome assessment (health care); Patient-reported outcome measure; Quality of life; Urethral stricture; Urethral surgery; Urethroplasty; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.eururo.2013.04.037
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Studies of interventions for urethral stricture have inferred patient benefit from clinician-driven outcomes or questionnaires lacking scientifically robust evidence of their measurement properties for men with this disease. Objective: To evaluate urethral reconstruction from the patients' perspective using a validated patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Design, setting, and participants: Forty-six men with anterior urethral stricture at four UK urology centres completed the PROM before (baseline) and 2 yr after urethroplasty. Intervention: A psychometrically robust PROM for men with urethral stricture disease. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), health status, and treatment satisfaction were measured, and paired t and Wilcoxon matched-pairs tests were used for comparative analysis. Results and limitations: Thirty-eight men underwent urethroplasty for bulbar stricture and eight for penile stricture. The median (range) follow-up was 25 (20-30) mo. Total LUTS scores (0 = least symptomatic, 24 = most symptomatic) improved from a median of 12 at baseline to 4 at 2 yr (mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] of differences 6.6 [4.2-9.1], p < 0.0001). A total of 33 men (72%) felt their urinary symptoms interfered less with their overall quality of life, 8 (17%) reported no change, and 5 (11%) were worse 2 yr after urethroplasty. Overall, 40 men (87%) remained "satisfied'' or "very satisfied'' with the outcome of their operation. Health status visual analogue scale scores (100 = best imaginable health, 0 = worst) 2 yr after urethroplasty improved from a mean of 69 at baseline to 79 (mean [95% CI] of differences 10 [2-18], p = 0.018). Health state index scores (1 = full health, 0 = dead) improved from 0.79 at baseline to 0.89 at 2 yr (mean [95% CI] of differences 0.10 [0.02-0.18), p = 0.012]). Conclusions: This is the first study to prospectively evaluate urethral reconstruction using a validated PROM. Men reported continued relief from symptoms with related improvements in overall health status 2 yr after urethroplasty. These data can be used as a provisional reference point against which urethral surgeons can benchmark their performance. (C) 2013 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 782
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Urethral Reconstruction
    Nima Baradaran
    Lindsay A. Hampson
    Todd C. Edwards
    Bryan B. Voelzke
    Benjamin N. Breyer
    Current Urology Reports, 2018, 19
  • [22] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Urethral Reconstruction
    Baradaran, Nima
    Hampson, Lindsay A.
    Edwards, Todd C.
    Voelzke, Bryan B.
    Breyer, Benjamin N.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2018, 19 (07)
  • [23] Evaluation of the Responsiveness of the SarQoL® Questionnaire, a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Specific to Sarcopenia
    Anton Geerinck
    Olivier Bruyère
    Médéa Locquet
    Jean-Yves Reginster
    Charlotte Beaudart
    Advances in Therapy, 2018, 35 : 1842 - 1858
  • [24] Evaluation of the Responsiveness of the SarQoL® Questionnaire, a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Specific to Sarcopenia
    Geerinck, Anton
    Bruyere, Olivier
    Locquet, Medea
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Beaudart, Charlotte
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2018, 35 (11) : 1842 - 1858
  • [25] Development of a patient-centred, patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for post-stroke cognitive rehabilitation: qualitative interviews with stroke survivors to inform design and content
    Patchick, Emma L.
    Horne, Maria
    Woodward-Nutt, Kate
    Vail, Andy
    Bowen, Audrey
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2015, 18 (06) : 3213 - 3224
  • [26] Validation of novel patient-centred juvenile idiopathic arthritis-specific patient-reported outcome and experience measures (PROMs/PREMs)
    Lunt, Laura E.
    Shoop-Worrall, Stephanie
    Smith, Nicola
    Cleary, Gavin
    McDonagh, Janet
    Smith, Andrew D.
    Thomson, Wendy
    McErlane, Flora
    PEDIATRIC RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [27] Toward Developing a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Fatigue in Hemodialysis
    Nair, Devika
    Finkelstein, Fredric O.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2019, 74 (02) : 151 - 154
  • [28] Surgical Outcome of Urethroplasty Using Penile Circular Fasciocutaneous Flap for Anterior Urethral Stricture
    Kim, Kyoung Rok
    Suh, Jun-Gyo
    Paick, Jae-Seung
    Kim, Soo Woong
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2014, 32 (02) : 87 - 92
  • [29] Measuring and Predicting Patient Dissatisfaction after Anterior Urethroplasty Using Patient Reported Outcomes Measures
    Bertrand, Laura A.
    Voelzke, Bryan B.
    Elliott, Sean P.
    Myers, Jeremy B.
    Breyer, Benjamin N.
    Vanni, Alex J.
    McClung, Christopher D.
    Tam, Christopher A.
    Warren, Gareth J.
    Erickson, Bradley A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (02) : 453 - 460
  • [30] Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Mohs Reconstruction
    Kavanagh, Kaitlin J.
    Christophel, J. Jared
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY & AESTHETIC MEDICINE, 2020, 22 (04) : 274 - 280