Neoproterozoic banded iron formations

被引:60
|
作者
Ilyin, A. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Inst Geol, Moscow 119017, Russia
关键词
SIDERITE FORMATION; MONGOLIAN MASSIF; ORE EPOCHS; AGE; CONSTRAINTS;
D O I
10.1134/S0024490209010064
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Two epochs of the formation of ferruginous quartzites-Archean-Paleoproterozoic (3.2-1.8 Ga) and Neoproterozoic (0.85-0.7 Ga)-are distinguished in the Precambrian. They are incommensurable in scale: the Paleoproterozoic Kursk Group of the Kursk Magnetic Anomaly (KMA) extends over 1500 km, whereas the extension of Neoproterozoic banded iron formations (BIF) beds does not exceed a few tens of kilometers. Their thickness is up to 200 m and not more than 10 m, respectively. The oldest BIFs are located in old platforms, whereas Neoproterozoic BIFs are mainly confined to Phanerozoic orogenic (mobile) zones. Neoproterozoic BIFs universally associate with glacial deposits and their beds include glacial dropstones. In places, they underlie tillites of the Laplandian (Marinoan) glaciation (635 Ma), but they are more often sandwiched between glaciogenic sequences of the Laplandian and preceding Sturtian or Rapitan glaciation (730-750 Ma). Neoproterozoic BIFs are rather diverse in terms of lithology due to variation in the grade of metamorphism from place to place from low grades of the greenschist facies up to the granulite facies. Correspondingly, the ore component is mainly represented by hematite or magnetite. The REE distribution and (Co + Ni + Cu) index suggest an influence of hydrothermal sources of Fe, although it was subordinate to the continental washout. Iron was accumulated in seawater during glaciations, whereas iron mineralization took place at the earliest stages of postglacial transgressions.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 86
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Neoproterozoic banded iron formations
    A. V. Ilyin
    Lithology and Mineral Resources, 2009, 44
  • [2] Production of Neoproterozoic banded iron formations in a partially ice-covered ocean
    Gianchandani K.
    Halevy I.
    Gildor H.
    Ashkenazy Y.
    Tziperman E.
    Nature Geoscience, 2024, 17 (4) : 298 - 301
  • [3] Production of Neoproterozoic banded iron formations in a partially ice-covered ocean
    Gianchandani, Kaushal
    Halevy, Itay
    Gildor, Hezi
    Ashkenazy, Yosef
    Tziperman, Eli
    NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2024, 17 (04)
  • [4] BANDED IRON FORMATIONS
    BOYLE, RW
    DAVIES, JL
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1973, 37 (05) : 1389 - 1389
  • [5] The genesis of the early Neoproterozoic Shilu banded iron formations: Could it be applied to other iron ore deposits?
    Yu, Liangliang
    Chen, Weixin
    Zhang, Bo
    Tian, Lihui
    Liu, Shiming
    Yang, Dezhi
    Wang, Liyuan
    ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS, 2022, 140
  • [6] MICROBIOTAS OF BANDED IRON FORMATIONS
    CLOUD, PE
    LICARI, GR
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1968, 61 (03) : 779 - &
  • [7] ORIGIN OF BANDED IRON FORMATIONS
    GOVETT, GJS
    GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA BULLETIN, 1966, 77 (11) : 1191 - &
  • [8] BANDED IRON FORMATIONS - REPLY
    HOLLAND, HD
    GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1973, 37 (05) : 1390 - 1390
  • [9] PRECAMBRIAN BANDED IRON FORMATIONS
    PICHAMUT.CS
    JOURNAL OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF INDIA, 1973, 14 (03) : 275 - 281
  • [10] SUBOXIC DIAGENESIS IN BANDED IRON FORMATIONS
    WALKER, JCG
    NATURE, 1984, 309 (5966) : 340 - 342