Three-dimensional kinematic comparison of treadmill and overground running

被引:84
作者
Sinclair, Jonathan [1 ]
Richards, Jim [2 ]
Taylor, Paul J. [3 ]
Edmundson, Christopher J. [1 ]
Brooks, Darrell [1 ]
Hobbs, Sarah J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cent Lancashire, Div Sport Exercise & Nutr Sci, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Cent Lancashire, Dept Allied Hlth Profess, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancs, England
[3] Univ Cent Lancashire, Sch Psychol, Preston PR1 2HE, Lancs, England
关键词
Biomechanics; joint angles; stance; gait; JOINT CENTER LOCATION; GAIT EVENTS; WALKING; BIOMECHANICS; PREDICTION; MOVEMENT; CRITERIA; PAIN;
D O I
10.1080/14763141.2012.759614
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The treadmill is an attractive device for the investigation of human locomotion, yet the extent to which lower limb kinematics differ from overground running remains a controversial topic. This study aimed to provide an extensive three-dimensional kinematic comparison of the lower extremities during overground and treadmill running. Twelve participants ran at 4.0m/s (+/- 5%) in both treadmill and overground conditions. Angular kinematic parameters of the lower extremities during the stance phase were collected at 250Hz using an eight-camera motion analysis system. Hip, knee, and ankle joint kinematics were quantified in the sagittal, coronal, and transverse planes, and contrasted using paired t-tests. Of the analysed parameters hip flexion at footstrike and ankle excursion to peak angle were found to be significantly reduced during treadmill running by 12 degrees (p=0.001) and 6.6 degrees (p=0.010), respectively. Treadmill running was found to be associated with significantly greater peak ankle eversion (by 6.3 degrees, p=0.006). It was concluded that the mechanics of treadmill running cannot be generalized to overground running.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 282
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   THE PRACTICAL BIOMECHANICS OF RUNNING [J].
ADELAAR, RS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1986, 14 (06) :497-500
[2]   A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking [J].
Alton, F ;
Baldey, L ;
Caplan, S ;
Morrissey, MC .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1998, 13 (06) :434-440
[3]   PREDICTION OF HIP-JOINT CENTER LOCATION FROM EXTERNAL LANDMARKS [J].
BELL, AL ;
BRAND, RA ;
PEDERSEN, DR .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 8 (01) :3-16
[4]   A COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF SEVERAL HIP CENTER LOCATION PREDICTION METHODS [J].
BELL, AL ;
PEDERSEN, DR ;
BRAND, RA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1990, 23 (06) :617-621
[5]  
BOBBERT MF, 1992, J BIOMECH, V28, P661
[6]   COMMENT ON CRITERIA FOR PATIENT-EVALUATION TOOLS [J].
BRAND, RA ;
CROWNINSHIELD, RD .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1981, 14 (09) :655-655
[7]   GAIT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY [J].
CAPPOZZO, A .
HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 3 (1-2) :27-50
[8]   Surface-marker cluster design criteria for 3-D bone movement reconstruction [J].
Cappozzo, A ;
Cappello, A ;
DellaCroce, U ;
Pensalfini, F .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1997, 44 (12) :1165-1174
[9]   POSITION AND ORIENTATION IN-SPACE OF BONES DURING MOVEMENT - ANATOMICAL FRAME DEFINITION AND DETERMINATION [J].
CAPPOZZO, A ;
CATANI, F ;
DELLA CROCE, U ;
LEARDINI, A .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 10 (04) :171-178
[10]   GROUND REACTION FORCES IN DISTANCE RUNNING [J].
CAVANAGH, PR ;
LAFORTUNE, MA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1980, 13 (05) :397-406