Emerging Trends in Optimal Structural Health Monitoring System Design: From Sensor Placement to System Evaluation

被引:37
作者
Barthorpe, Robert James [1 ]
Worden, Keith [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Mech Engn, Dynam Res Grp, Mappin St, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
sensor placement optimisation; structural health monitoring; damage identification; mutual information; evolutionary optimisation; ORBIT MODAL IDENTIFICATION; DAMAGE; LOCATIONS; FAULT; OPTIMIZATION; METHODOLOGY; INFORMATION; NETWORKS; ERROR;
D O I
10.3390/jsan9030031
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper presents a review of advances in the field of Sensor Placement Optimisation (SPO) strategies for Structural Health Monitoring (SHM). This task has received a great deal of attention in the research literature, from initial foundations in the control engineering literature to adoption in a modal or system identification context in the structural dynamics community. Recent years have seen an increasing focus on methods that are specific to damage identification, with the maximisation of correct classification outcomes being prioritised. The objectives of this article are to present the SPO for SHM problem, to provide an overview of the current state of the art in this area, and to identify promising emergent trends within the literature. The key conclusions drawn are that there remains a great deal of scope for research in a number of key areas, including the development of methods that promote robustness to modelling uncertainty, benign effects within measured data, and failures within the sensor network. There also remains a paucity of studies that demonstrate practical, experimental evaluation of developed SHM system designs. Finally, it is argued that the pursuit of novel or highly efficient optimisation methods may be considered to be of secondary importance in an SPO context, given that the optimisation effort is expended at the design stage.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1997, P DAMAS 97
[2]  
Barthorpe R., 2009, ENCY STRUCTURAL HLTH, DOI [10.1002/9780470061626.shm086, DOI 10.1002/9780470061626.SHM086]
[3]   Optimal sensor placement for enhancing sensitivity to change in stiffness for structural health monitoring [J].
Beal, Josh M. ;
Shukla, Amit ;
Brezhneva, Olga A. ;
Abramson, Mark A. .
OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2008, 9 (02) :119-142
[4]   Deploying Wireless Sensor Networks with Fault-Tolerance for Structural Health Monitoring [J].
Bhuiyan, Md Zakirul Alam ;
Wang, Guojun ;
Cao, Jiannong ;
Wu, Jie .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS, 2015, 64 (02) :382-395
[5]   Robustness of optimal sensor placement under parametric uncertainty [J].
Castro-Triguero, Rafael ;
Murugan, Senthil ;
Gallego, Rafael ;
Friswell, Michael I. .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2013, 41 (1-2) :268-287
[6]   Structural health monitoring: Closing the gap between research and industrial deployment [J].
Cawley, Peter .
STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2018, 17 (05) :1225-1244
[7]   Impact damage location in composite structures using optimized sensor triangulation procedure [J].
Coverley, PT ;
Staszewski, WJ .
SMART MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2003, 12 (05) :795-803
[8]   Cointegration: a novel approach for the removal of environmental trends in structural health monitoring data [J].
Cross, Elizabeth J. ;
Worden, Keith ;
Chen, Qian .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2011, 467 (2133) :2712-2732
[9]   Optimum Sensor Placement for Impact Location Using Trilateration [J].
De Stefano, M. ;
Gherlone, M. ;
Mattone, M. ;
Di Sciuva, M. ;
Worden, K. .
STRAIN, 2015, 51 (02) :89-100
[10]   An introduction to ROC analysis [J].
Fawcett, Tom .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2006, 27 (08) :861-874