Moderate eugenics and human enhancement

被引:16
作者
Selgelid, Michael J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Sch Philosoph Hist & Int Studies, Ctr Human Bioeth, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
关键词
Ethics; Genetics; Eugenics; Enhancement; Liberty; Equality; Moderate; Pluralism; PROCREATIVE BENEFICENCE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1007/s11019-013-9485-1
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Though the reputation of eugenics has been tarnished by history, eugenics per se is not necessarily a bad thing. Many advocate a liberal new eugenics-where individuals are free to choose whether or not to employ genetic technologies for reproductive purposes. Though genetic interventions aimed at the prevention of severe genetic disorders may be morally and socially acceptable, reproductive liberty in the context of enhancement may conflict with equality. Enhancement could also have adverse effects on utility. The enhancement debate requires a shift in focus. What the equality and/or utility costs of enhancement will be is an empirical question. Rather than philosophical speculation, more social science research is needed to address it. Philosophers, meanwhile, should address head-on the question of how to strike a balance between liberty, equality, and utility in cases of conflict (in the context of genetics).
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 12
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Wondergenes: Genetic Enhancement and the Future of Society
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Racial Hygiene: Medicine Under the Nazis
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Liberal eugenics: In defence of human enhancement
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, ENHANCING EVOLUTION
[5]  
Black Edwin., 2003, WAR WEAK EUGENICS AM
[6]   HEALTH AS A THEORETICAL CONCEPT [J].
BOORSE, C .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1977, 44 (04) :542-573
[7]  
Bourne H, 2012, MONASH BIOETH REV, V30, P29
[8]  
Buchanan A., 2000, CHANCE CHOICE GENETI
[9]  
Carlson ElofAxel., 2001, UNFIT HIST BAD IDEA
[10]  
Chan S, 2007, Studies in Ethics, Law and Technology, V1