Factors affecting the clinical use of non-invasive prenatal testing: a mixed methods systematic review

被引:32
作者
Skirton, Heather [1 ]
Patch, Christine [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Plymouth, Fac Hlth Educ & Soc, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[2] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust London, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
FREE FETAL DNA; HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS; SEX DETERMINATION; DIAGNOSIS; ATTITUDES; ANEUPLOIDY; WOMEN; PREFERENCES; BENEFITS; READY;
D O I
10.1002/pd.4094
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Non-invasive prenatal testing has been in clinical use for a decade; however, there is evidence that this technology will be more widely applied within the next few years. Guidance is therefore required to ensure that the procedure is offered in a way that is evidence based and ethically and clinically acceptable. We conducted a systematic review of the current relevant literature to ascertain the factors that should be considered when offering non-invasive prenatal testing in a clinical setting. We undertook a systematic search of relevant databases, journals and reference lists, and from an initial list of 298 potential papers, identified 11 that were directly relevant to the study. Original data were extracted and presented in a table, and the content of all papers was analysed and presented in narrative form. Four main themes emerged: perceived attributes of the test, regulation and ethical issues, non-invasive prenatal testing in practice and economic considerations. However, there was a basic difference in the approach of actual or potential service users, who were very positive about the benefits of the technology, compared with other research participants, who were concerned with the potential moral and ethical outcomes of using this testing method. Recommendations for the appropriate use of non-invasive prenatal testing are made. (c) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:532 / 541
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Cell-free fetal DNA testing for fetal aneuploidy and beyond: clinical integration challenges in the US context
    Allyse, Megan
    Sayres, Lauren C.
    King, Jaime S.
    Norton, Mary E.
    Cho, Mildred K.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27 (11) : 3123 - 3131
  • [2] [Anonymous], NON PREN TEST FET AN
  • [3] [Anonymous], SEX DISABIL
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, SYSTEMATIC REV
  • [5] [Anonymous], REC R 90 13 COMM MIN
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2004, Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. (HTA Initiative #13), DOI DOI 10.7939/R37M04F16
  • [7] Braun V., 2006, Qualitative Research in Psychology, V3, P77, DOI 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • [8] Attitudes towards prenatal diagnosis and termination in women who have a sibling with Down's syndrome
    Bryant, L
    Hewison, JD
    Green, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 23 (02) : 181 - 198
  • [9] Noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy-ready for prime time?
    Chitty, Lyn S.
    Hill, Melissa
    White, Helen
    Wright, David
    Morris, Stephen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 206 (04) : 269 - 275
  • [10] Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal blood group phenotypes: current practice and future prospects
    Daniels, Geoff
    Finning, Kirstin
    Martin, Pete
    Massey, Edwin
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2009, 29 (02) : 101 - 107