Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecological Oncology

被引:9
|
作者
Bush, Stephen H. [1 ]
Apte, Sachin M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Coll Med, H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Tampa, FL 33612 USA
关键词
LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; CERVICAL-CARCINOMA; TRAINING-PROGRAM; LEARNING-CURVE; OUTCOMES; LYMPHADENECTOMY; COST; LAPAROTOMY; OBESE;
D O I
10.1177/107327481502200308
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Robotic-assisted surgery is a technological advancement, and its use is rapidly expanding into the field of gynecological oncology. However, a paucity of evidence exists to prove its superiority over standard laparoscopy. Its cost is also high and it lacks haptic feedback. Methods: A systematic review of the relevant literature was undertaken to understand the use of robotic-assisted surgery in gynecological oncology. Results: Robotic-assisted surgery is being used for select cases of endometrial cancer and has resulted in the increased utilization of minimally invasive surgery for such patients. Use of robotic-assisted surgery among patients who are obese has led to decreased complication rates. Robotic-assisted surgery appears to be more expensive than traditional laparoscopy; however, there are potential cost savings to robotic-assisted surgery, including shorter hospital stays and fewer complications, compared with laparotomy. Conclusions: The gynecological oncology community is rapidly accepting the use of robotic-assisted surgery. Although randomized controlled trials are lacking, the technology appears to be safe and effective, and it has equivalent oncological outcomes in this patient population.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 313
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] New horizons in gynecological surgery: first-year experience with HUGO™ robotic-assisted surgery system at two tertiary referral robotic centers
    Afonina, Margarita
    Ruvolo, Claudia Colla
    Gaia, Giorgia
    Paciotti, Marco
    Leva, Giovanni
    Marconi, Anna Maria
    Traen, Koen
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2024, 76 (05) : 2043 - 2049
  • [42] The current state of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery
    Winer, Josh
    Can, Mehmet F.
    Bartlett, David L.
    Zeh, Herbert J.
    Zureikat, Amer H.
    NATURE REVIEWS GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 9 (08) : 468 - 476
  • [43] OUTCOMES OF ROBOTIC-ASSISTED REVISIONAL BARIATRIC SURGERY
    Elzein, Steven M.
    Corzo, Maria
    Pena, Victor G.
    Shetty, Sachin
    Tomey, Daniel
    Oviedo, Rodolfo J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S1549 - S1549
  • [44] Robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) lobectomy
    Choe, Giye
    Park, Bernard
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2019, 8 (02) : 296 - 299
  • [45] Pediatric robotic-assisted surgery in the United States
    Lee, Justin
    Moriarty, Kevin P.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (03) : S152 - S153
  • [46] Anesthetic Considerations in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Vadivelu, Nalini
    Ahuja, Nitin
    Mitra, Sukanya
    Silasi, Dan
    Urman, Richard D.
    OCHSNER JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (04): : 517 - 524
  • [47] Robotic-assisted surgery for benign urological conditions
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Challacombe, Ben J.
    Zaheer, Lail-U-Mah
    Khan, M. Shamim
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    THESCIENTIFICWORLDJOURNAL, 2006, 6 : 2573 - 2580
  • [48] MAUDE: Analysis of Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery
    Manoucheri, Elmira
    Fuchs-Weizman, Noga
    Cohen, Sarah L.
    Wang, Karen C.
    Einarsson, Jon
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (04) : 592 - 595
  • [49] Robotic-assisted surgery in children: Advantages and limitations
    Al-Bassam A.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2010, 4 (1) : 19 - 22
  • [50] On the Kinematics of Robotic-assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery
    From, Pal Johan
    MODELING IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL, 2013, 34 (02) : 69 - 82