Association of differential miRNA expression with hepatic vs. peritoneal metastatic spread in colorectal cancer

被引:22
作者
Heublein, Sabine [1 ,2 ]
Albertsmeier, Markus [1 ]
Pfeifer, David [1 ]
Loehrs, Lisa [3 ]
Bazhin, Alexandr V. [1 ,4 ]
Kirchner, Thomas [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Werner, Jens [1 ,4 ]
Neumann, Jens [3 ]
Angele, Martin Kurt [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp LMU Munich, Dept Gen Visceral Transplantat & Vasc Surg, Marachioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Heidelberg Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Inst Pathol, Munich, Germany
[4] German Canc Consortium DKTK, Heidelberg, Germany
[5] German Canc Res Ctr, Heidelberg, Germany
来源
BMC CANCER | 2018年 / 18卷
关键词
Colorectal cancer; miRNA; Metastasis; LIVER METASTASES; COLON-CANCER; STEM-CELLS; DOWN-REGULATION; PRIMARY TUMORS; BREAST-CANCER; CARCINOMATOSIS; MICRORNA-31; ADENOCARCINOMA; EPIDEMIOLOGY;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-018-4043-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Though peritoneal carcinomatosis reflects a late stage of colorectal cancer (CRC), only few patients present with synchronous or metachronous liver metastases alongside their peritoneal carcinomatosis. It is hypothesized that this phenomenon may be causally linked to molecular characteristics of the primary CRC. This study used miRNA profiling of primary CRC tissue either metastasized to the liver, to the peritoneum or not metastasized at all thus to identify miRNAs potentially associated with defining the site of metastatic spread in CRC. Methods: Tissue of the primary tumor stemming from CRC patients diagnosed for either liver metastasis (LM; n = 10) or peritoneal carcinomatosis (PER; n = 10) was analyzed in this study. Advanced CRC cases without metastasis (M0; n = 3) were also included thus to select on those miRNAs most potentially associated with determining metastatic spread in general. miRNA profiling of 754 different miRNAs was performed in each group. MiRNAs being either differentially expressed comparing PER and LM or even triple differentially expressed (PER vs. LM vs. M0) were identified. Differentially expressed miRNAs were further validated by in silico and functional analysis. Results: Comparative analysis identified 41 miRNAs to be differentially expressed comparing primary tumors metastasized to the liver as opposed to those spread to the peritoneum. A set of 31 miRNAs was significantly induced in primary tumors that spread to the peritoneum (PER), while the remaining 10 miRNAs were found to be repressed. Out of these 41 miRNAs a number of 25 miRNAs was triple-differentially expressed (i.e. differentially expressed comparing LM vs. PER vs. M0). The latter underwent in silico analysis. Finally, we demonstrated that miR-31 down-regulated c-MET in DLD-1 colon cancer cells. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that CRC primary tumors spread to the peritoneum vs. metastasized to the liver display significantly different miRNA profiles. Larger patient cohorts will be needed to validate whether determination of e.g. miR-31 may aid to predict the course of disease and whether this may help to create individualized follow up or treatment protocols. To determine whether certain miRNAs may be involved in regulating the metastatic potential of CRC, functional studies will be essential.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2016, F1000RES
  • [2] MicroRNA expression profiling reveals the potential function of microRNA-31 in chordomas
    Bayrak, Omer Faruk
    Gulluoglu, Sukru
    Aydemir, Esra
    Ture, Ugur
    Acar, Hasan
    Atalay, Basar
    Demir, Zeynel
    Sevli, Serhat
    Creighton, Chad J.
    Ittmann, Michael
    Sahin, Fikrettin
    Ozen, Mustafa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 115 (02) : 143 - 151
  • [3] Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer metastasis: A system review
    Cao, Hui
    Xu, Enping
    Liu, Hong
    Wan, Ledong
    lai, Maode
    [J]. PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2015, 211 (08) : 557 - 569
  • [4] Surgical resection of primary tumors in patients who present with stage IV colorectal cancer: An analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data, 1988 to 2000
    Cook, AD
    Single, R
    McCahill, LE
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 12 (08) : 637 - 645
  • [5] Colorectal cancer surveillance: 2005 update of an American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guideline
    Desch, CE
    Benson, A
    Somerfield, MR
    Flynn, PJ
    Krause, C
    Loprinzi, CL
    Minsky, BD
    Pfister, DG
    Virgo, KS
    Petrelli, NJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (33) : 8512 - 8519
  • [6] Intratumoral Morphological Heterogeneity of Breast Cancer As an Indicator of the Metastatic Potential and Tumor Chemosensitivity
    Gerashchenko, T. S.
    Zavyalova, M. V.
    Denisov, E. V.
    Krakhmal, N. V.
    Pautova, D. N.
    Litviakov, N. V.
    Vtorushin, S. V.
    Cherdyntseva, N. V.
    Perelmuter, V. M.
    [J]. ACTA NATURAE, 2017, 9 (01): : 56 - 67
  • [7] MicroRNA-31 Inhibits Lung Adenocarcinoma Stem-Like Cells via Down-Regulation of MET-PI3K-Akt Signaling Pathway
    Hou, Chunying
    Sun, Bo
    Jiang, Yao
    Zheng, Ji
    Yang, Nan
    Ji, Chao
    Liang, Zhen
    Shi, Jiaojiao
    Zhang, Rui
    Liu, Yanyong
    Ye, Caiying
    Zuo, Pingping
    [J]. ANTI-CANCER AGENTS IN MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2016, 16 (04) : 501 - 518
  • [8] The CDX1-microRNA-215 axis regulates colorectal cancer stem cell differentiation
    Jones, Matthew F.
    Hara, Toshifumi
    Francis, Princy
    Li, Xiao Ling
    Bilke, Sven
    Zhu, Yuelin
    Pineda, Marbin
    Subramanian, Murugan
    Bodmer, Walter F.
    Lal, Ashish
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (13) : E1550 - E1558
  • [9] Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method
    Livak, KJ
    Schmittgen, TD
    [J]. METHODS, 2001, 25 (04) : 402 - 408
  • [10] MicroRNA Signatures: Novel Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer?
    Luo, Xiaoya
    Burwinkel, Barbara
    Tao, Sha
    Brenner, Hermann
    [J]. CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2011, 20 (07) : 1272 - 1286