A Brief Survey on Forgetting from a Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Perspective

被引:37
|
作者
Eiter, Thomas [1 ]
Kern-Isberner, Gabriele [2 ]
机构
[1] TU Wien, Inst Logic & Computat, Vienna, Austria
[2] TU Dortmund, Dept Comp Sci, Dortmund, Germany
来源
KUNSTLICHE INTELLIGENZ | 2019年 / 33卷 / 01期
关键词
Forgetting; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Logic; Answer set programming; Nonmononotonic reasoning; Modal logics; Interpolation; Relevance; Independence; LOGIC; CIRCUMSCRIPTION; REVISION;
D O I
10.1007/s13218-018-0564-6
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Forgetting is an ambivalent concept of (human) intelligence. By definition, it is negatively related to knowledge in that knowledge is lost, be it deliberately or not, and therefore, forgetting has not received as much attention in the field of knowledge representation and reasoning (KRR) as other processes with a more positive orientation, like query answering, inference, or update. However, from a cognitive view, forgetting also has an ordering function in the human mind, suppressing information that is deemed irrelevant and improving cognitive capabilities to focus and deal only with relevant aspects of the problem under consideration. In this regard, forgetting is a crucial part of reasoning. This paper collects and surveys approaches to forgetting in the field of knowledge representation and reasoning, highlighting their roles in diverse tasks of knowledge processing, and elaborating on common techniques. We recall forgetting operations for propositional and predicate logic, as well as for answer set programming (as an important representative of nonmonotonic logics) and modal logics. We discuss forgetting in the context of (ir)relevance and (in)dependence, and explicit the role of forgetting for specific tasks of knowledge representation, showing its positive impact on solving KRR problems.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 33
页数:25
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] A Brief Survey on Forgetting from a Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Perspective
    Thomas Eiter
    Gabriele Kern-Isberner
    KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 2019, 33 : 9 - 33
  • [2] Bounded treewidth as a key to tractability of knowledge representation and reasoning
    Gottlob, Georg
    Pichler, Reinhard
    Wei, Fang
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2010, 174 (01) : 105 - 132
  • [3] A survey of formalisms for representing and reasoning with scientific knowledge
    Hunter, Anthony
    Liu, Weiru
    KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2010, 25 (02) : 199 - 222
  • [4] Multicriteria requirement ranking based on uncertain knowledge representation and reasoning
    Ma, Yufeng
    Dou, Yajie
    Xu, Xiangqian
    Jiang, Jiang
    Yang, Kewei
    Tan, Yuejin
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2024, 59
  • [5] Neurosymbolic AI for Reasoning Over Knowledge Graphs: A Survey
    Delong, Lauren Nicole
    Mir, Ramon Fernandez
    Fleuriot, Jacques D.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2024,
  • [6] Legal linguistic templates and the tension between legal knowledge representation and reasoning
    Libal, Tomer
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 6
  • [7] From Deduction to Knowledge Representation
    Vince, Michal
    Sefranek, Jan
    ORGANON F, 2013, 20 : 216 - 234
  • [8] THE RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING PROCEDURES UNDER UNCERTAINTY FOR METAL CASTING
    Kluska-Nawarecka, S.
    Nawarecki, E.
    Sniezynski, B.
    Wilk-Kolodziejczyk, D.
    METALURGIJA, 2015, 54 (01): : 263 - 266
  • [9] Knowledge representation and reasoning method in complex hierarchy model
    Wang X.
    Gao X.
    Xitong Gongcheng Lilun yu Shijian/System Engineering Theory and Practice, 2019, 39 (11): : 2918 - 2927
  • [10] A New Method for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning of Semantic Web
    Wang, Jie
    Han, X. -P.
    Zhang, Y. -Y.
    Liu, C. -N.
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND NEURAL COMPUTING (FSNC 2011), VOL IV, 2011, : 34 - 37