Can we manage lupus nephritis without chronic corticosteroids administration?

被引:36
|
作者
Lightstone, Liz [1 ]
Doria, Andrea [2 ]
Wilson, Hannah [1 ]
Ward, Frank L. [3 ]
Larosa, Maddalena [2 ]
Bargman, Joanne M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Fac Med, Dept Med, Sect Renal Med & Vasc Inflammat,Imperial Coll Lup, London, England
[2] Univ Padua, Dept Med, Div Rheumatol, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Med, Div Nephrol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Corticosteroids; Lupus nephritis; Management; Adverse events; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; PULSE METHYLPREDNISOLONE; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; INTRAVENOUS CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE; ACCELERATED ATHEROSCLEROSIS; MAINTENANCE THERAPY; RISK-FACTORS; DOUBLE-BLIND; ERYTHEMATOSUS; RITUXIMAB;
D O I
10.1016/j.autrev.2017.11.002
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
The outcome of lupus nephritis (LN) has changed since the introduction of glucocorticoids (GCs), which dramatically reduced the mortality related to one of the most severe complications of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Since the 1950's, other immunosuppressants, including biologic drugs (i.e. rituximab) have aided in maintaining remission, preserving kidney function, but not preventing treatment-related toxicity. GCs still remain the cornerstone in the treatment of SLE, including LN, and they are widely used in clinical practice. However, GC administration represents a double-edged sword. Indeed, from one side they allow a fast and effective control of disease activity by dampening inflammation; from the other side, they have many and severe side effects leading to organ damage. In this paper, we will discuss pros and cons of the chronic use of GCs, especially focusing on LN. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 10
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条