Biomechanical robustness of a new proximal epiphyseal hip replacement to patient variability and surgical uncertainties: A FE study

被引:18
作者
Martelli, S. [1 ]
Taddei, F. [1 ]
Schileo, E. [1 ]
Cristofolini, L. [1 ,2 ]
Rushton, Neil [3 ]
Viceconti, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ist Ortoped Rizzoli, Lab Tecnol Med, I-40136 Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Bologna, Fac Ingn, Bologna, Italy
[3] Univ Cambridge, Orthopaed Res Unit, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
关键词
Hip prosthesis; Biomechanics; Finite element model; Failure risk sensitivity; Numerical pre-clinical validation; Epiphyseal hip replacement robustness; Femoral head resurfacing; FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS; RESURFACED FEMORAL-HEAD; LOAD-TRANSFER; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; IMPLANT DESIGN; NECK FRACTURES; DENSITY; ARTHROPLASTY; STRESS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.006
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The biomechanical behaviour of current hip epiphyseal replacements is notably sensitive to the typical variability of conditions following a standard surgery. The aim of the present study was to assess the biomechanical robustness to the variability of post-operative conditions of an innovative proximal epiphyseal replacement (PER) hip device featuring a short, curved and cemented stem. The risk of femoral neck fractures, prosthesis fractures and aseptic loosening were assessed through a validated finite element procedure following a systematic approach. Risk changes due to anatomical variations were assessed mimicking extreme conditions in terms of femoral size and level of osteoporosis. Failure risks associated with surgical uncertainties were assessed mimicking extreme conditions in terms of uncertainties on the prosthesis position/alignment, cement-bone interdigitation depth, and friction between the prosthesis and the hosting cavity. The femoral neck strength increased after implantation from 9% to 49% and was most sensitive to changes of the anatomo-physiological variables. The risk of stem fractures was low in all studied configurations. The risk of stem loosening was low and most sensitive to surgical uncertainties. In conclusion, the new device can be considered an effective alternative to current epiphyseal replacements. Care is recommended in a proper seating of the prosthesis in the femur. (C) 2011 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 171
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip [J].
Amstutz, HC ;
Campbell, PA ;
Le Duff, MJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (09) :1874-1877
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, OST CONS DEV C
[3]   Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings - An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips [J].
Back, DL ;
Dalziel, R ;
Young, D ;
Shimmin, A .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2005, 87B (03) :324-329
[4]   Mechanisms of uniformity of yield strains for trabecular bone [J].
Bayraktar, HH ;
Keaveny, TM .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2004, 37 (11) :1671-1678
[5]   Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities [J].
Bergmann, G ;
Deuretzbacher, G ;
Heller, M ;
Graichen, F ;
Rohlmann, A ;
Strauss, J ;
Duda, GN .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 34 (07) :859-871
[6]  
Black J., 1998, HDB BIOMATERIAL PROP
[7]   Hip resurfacing arthroplasty [J].
Buergi, Martin L. ;
Walter, William L. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (07) :61-65
[8]   Role of mechanical environment and implant design on bone tissue differentiation:: current knowledge and future contexts [J].
Çehreli, M ;
Sahin, S ;
Akça, K .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2004, 32 (02) :123-132
[9]   Current concepts of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing [J].
Clarke, IC ;
Donaldson, T ;
Bowsher, JG ;
Nasser, S ;
Takahashi, T .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 36 (02) :143-+
[10]   Hip Resurfacing Data from National Joint Registries What Do They Tell Us? What Do They Not Tell Us? [J].
Corten, Kristoff ;
MacDonald, Steven J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (02) :351-357