Impact of Lower Pole Calculi in Patients Undergoing Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

被引:25
作者
Martin, Francois [1 ]
Hoarau, Nicolas [1 ]
Lebdai, Souhil [1 ]
Pichon, Thomas [1 ]
Chautard, Denis [1 ]
Culty, Thibaut [1 ]
Azzouzi, Abdel Rahmene [1 ]
Bigot, Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] Angers Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, F-49000 Angers, France
关键词
SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY; FLEXIBLE URETEROSCOPY; LASER LITHOTRIPSY; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; IN-SITU; STONES;
D O I
10.1089/end.2013.0515
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess if the presence of a lower pole stone (LPS) decreases the stone-free (SF) rate following retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). The second purpose was to assess the result of RIRS for LPS and to identify predictors of SF status. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 205 procedures in 162 patients with renal stones treated by RIRS between January 2010 and January 2013 at a single institute. The SF status was defined as no residual fragments. Independent-sample t-tests and Chi-square tests were used for comparisons of means and proportions, respectively, between patients with or without LPS. Logistic regression models were used to assess prognostic factors influencing SF status in cases of LPS. Results: LPS were present in 89 (54.9%) patients. There were no differences between patients with or without LPS regarding the mean operative time (p=0.77), the surgeon's experience (p=0.522), the length of hospital stay (p=0.269), and the SF rate (p=0.224). SF status after RIRS in patients with or without LPS was 74.1% and 78% (p=0.224), respectively. In the case of LPS, the presence of multiple stones and a history of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) were predictive factors for occurrence of residual fragments in univariate analysis (p=0.037 and p=0.015). In multivariable analysis, only the presence of multiple stones remained as a predictive factor (p=0.027; HR=3.2), whereas a trend was observed when there was a history of PCNL (p=0.07; HR=3). Conclusion: The presence of a LPS does not alter the SF rate of RIRS even in cases of early experience. RIRS for LPS appears to be an effective technique, but special attention should be given to patients with multiple stones and/or a history of PCNL.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 145
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial
    Zeng, Guohua
    Zhang, Tao
    Agrawal, Madhu
    He, Xiang
    Zhang, Wei
    Xiao, Kefeng
    Li, Hulin
    Li, Xuedong
    Xu, Changbao
    Yang, Sixing
    de la Rosette, Jean J.
    Fan, Junhong
    Zhu, Wei
    Sarica, Kemal
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 122 (06) : 1034 - 1040
  • [22] Does Relocation of Lower Pole Stone During Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Improve Stone-Free Rate? A Prospective Randomized Study
    Shrestha, Anil
    Adhikari, Baikuntha
    Shah, Arvind Kumar
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2023, 37 (01) : 21 - 27
  • [23] Retrograde intrarenal surgery by flexible ureteroscope in patients with spinal deformities
    Polat, Fazli
    Yesil, Suleyman
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2017, 40 (01) : 26 - 29
  • [24] Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in Patients with Spinal Deformities
    Resorlu, Berkan
    Ozyuvali, Ekrem
    Oguz, Ural
    Bozkurt, Omer Faruk
    Unsal, Ali
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (09) : 1131 - 1135
  • [25] The Evolving Role of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery in the Treatment of Urolithiasis
    Sanguedolce, Francesco
    Bozzini, Giorgio
    Chew, Ben
    Kallidonis, Panagiotis
    de la Rosette, Jean
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2017, 3 (01): : 46 - 55
  • [26] Outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery compared with ultra-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of renal calculi
    Pai, Aakash
    Wai, Htut Aung
    Ali, Miriam
    Theaker, Michael
    Watson, Graham
    Mackie, Simon
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 72 (02) : 169 - 173
  • [27] A prospective randomized comparison of micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (Microperc) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for the management of lower pole kidney stones
    Kandemir, Abdulkadir
    Guven, Selcuk
    Balasar, Mehmet
    Sonmez, Mehmet Giray
    Taskapu, Hakan
    Gurbuz, Recai
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 35 (11) : 1771 - 1776
  • [28] Role of pelvicalyceal anatomy in the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for lower pole stones: outcomes with a systematic review of literature
    Sulaiman Sadaf Karim
    Luke Hanna
    Robert Geraghty
    Bhaskar K. Somani
    Urolithiasis, 2020, 48 : 263 - 270
  • [29] Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery vs Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Intermediate Size Inferior Pole Calculi: A Prospective Assessment of Objective and Subjective Outcomes
    Singh, Bhupendra Pal
    Prakash, Jai
    Sankhwar, Satya Narayan
    Dhakad, Urmila
    Sankhwar, Pushp Lata
    Goel, Apul
    Kumar, Manoj
    UROLOGY, 2014, 83 (05) : 1016 - 1022
  • [30] Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: a randomized controlled trial
    Sabnis, Ravindra B.
    Ganesamoni, Raguram
    Doshi, Amit
    Ganpule, Arvind P.
    Jagtap, Jitendra
    Desai, Mahesh R.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 112 (03) : 355 - 361