Measuring Family Quality of Life: Scoping Review of the Available Scales and Future Directions

被引:15
作者
Alnahdi, Ghaleb H. [1 ]
Alwadei, Arwa [1 ]
Woltran, Flora [2 ]
Schwab, Susanne [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz Univ, Coll Educ, Special Educ Dept, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
[2] Univ Vienna, Ctr Teacher Educ, Dept Educ, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[3] North West Univ Vanderbijlpark, Optentia Res Focus Area, 1174 Hendrick Van Eck Blvd, ZA-1900 Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
关键词
family quality of life; intellectual disabilities; measurement instruments; scoping review; INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; TAIWANESE FAMILIES; CHILDREN; VALIDITY; PERSPECTIVES; VALIDATION; CONSTRUCT; OUTCOMES; PARENTS;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph192315473
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The lack of quality of life is a key issue for families with children with an intellectual disability. While the quality of life for people with disabilities has previously been researched as an individual variable, this has now shifted to include family members. The purpose of this study was to conduct a review of the studies measuring the quality of life of families with an intellectually disabled member, in order to identify the most commonly used scales and their psychometric properties. Method: Data were collected from six databases (ERIC, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL, MedLine, and Google Scholar), and this search yielded 3948 studies. One hundred and twenty studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Results: Nine scales were used in the last years to measure the quality of life for families with individuals with an intellectual disability. The Beach Center scale was the most common scale, followed by the Family Quality of Life Survey and the World Health Organization's quality of life assessment (WHOQoL-BREF). The results showed that the included studies in the review lack the consideration of a broader population representing the different types of cultures with different socioeconomic backgrounds. Key aspects used to assess the FQoL are environmental factors (proximal and distal factors), as well as economic factors. Conclusion: Although the operationalization of the FQoL often incudes several subthemes, a general agreement regarding which domains of the FQoL need to be included in the measurements, and these do not exist right now. Moreover, multidimensional scales are still rare.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Psychometric Properties of the Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale: Arabic Version [J].
Alnahdi, Ghaleb H. ;
Schwab, Susanne ;
Elhadi, Ayman .
JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES, 2021, 30 (12) :3131-3140
[2]  
Alshamri K.H., 2016, THESIS W SYDNEY PENR
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Family quality of life survey: Main caregivers of people with intellectual or developmental disabilities
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, BEACH CTR FAMILY QUA
[5]   Family quality of life: adaptation to Spanish population of several family support questionnaires [J].
Balcells-Balcells, A. ;
Gine, C. ;
Guardia-Olmos, J. ;
Summers, J. A. .
JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2011, 55 :1151-1163
[6]   The Spanish Family Quality of Life Scales under and over 18 Years Old: Psychometric Properties and Families' Perceptions [J].
Balcells-Balcells, Anna ;
Mas, Joana M. ;
Baques, Natasha ;
Simon, Cecilia ;
Garcia-Ventura, Simon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (21) :1-19
[7]  
Beltran F, 2015, EURASIA PROC ED SOC, V3, P57
[8]   Family Quality of Life: A Key Outcome in Early Childhood Intervention ServicesA Scoping Review [J].
Bhopti, Anoo ;
Brown, Ted ;
Lentin, Primrose .
JOURNAL OF EARLY INTERVENTION, 2016, 38 (04) :191-211
[9]   Rethinking FQoL: The Dynamic Interplay Between Individual and Family Quality of Life [J].
Boelsma, Femke ;
Caubo-Damen, Irene ;
Schippers, Alice ;
Dane, Menco ;
Abma, Tineke A. .
JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2017, 14 (01) :31-38
[10]  
Bourdieu P., 1986, HDB THEORY RES SOCIO, P81