Comparing greenhouse gas emissions of precast in-situ and conventional construction methods

被引:80
作者
Ji, Yingbo [1 ]
Li, Kaijian [2 ]
Liu, Guiwen [2 ]
Shrestha, Asheem [2 ]
Jing, Jinxi [2 ]
机构
[1] North China Univ Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Beijing 100144, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Univ, Fac Construct Management & Real Estate, Chongqing 400045, Peoples R China
关键词
Emissions; Environmental impact; Greenhouse gas; Precast in-situ; HONG-KONG; EMBODIED ENERGY; BUILDINGS; PREFABRICATION; BARRIERS; SYSTEMS; OFFSITE; MODEL; UK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.143
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Precast in-situ construction is gaining popularity among construction practitioners in China for its efficient system and its ability to reduce construction waste. However, there has been little to no empirical evidence that elucidates the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from this method. In an effort to address this knowledge gap, this paper establishes a systems boundary for the measurement of GHG emissions for precast in-situ construction. Employing a quantitative model, the GHG emissions of precast in-situ is determined and compared with conventional construction method. Results show that the precast in-situ construction produces less GHG emissions than the conventional method. Embodied GHG of building materials is found to be the main GHG emitter in both precast in-situ and conventional construction methods. Furthermore, four factors are identified that positively contributes towards reduced emissions: (i) embodied GHG emissions of building materials, (ii) transportation of building materials, (iii) resource consumption of equipment and techniques and (iv) transportation of waste and soil. Conversely, the transportation of on-site manufacturing equipment is identified as a negative factor on reduced emissions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 134
页数:11
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EN EFF BUILD
[2]   Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules [J].
Aye, Lu ;
Ngo, T. ;
Crawford, R. H. ;
Gammampila, R. ;
Mendis, P. .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2012, 47 :159-168
[3]  
Baird G, 1997, IPENZ Transactions, V24, P46
[4]  
Bin YE, 2011, J HARBIN U SCI TECHN
[5]   Analysis of embodied energy use in the residential building of Hong Kong [J].
Chen, TY ;
Burnett, J ;
Chau, CK .
ENERGY, 2001, 26 (04) :323-340
[6]   Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems [J].
Cole, RJ .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 34 (03) :335-348
[7]   Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildings [J].
Dimoudi, A. ;
Tompa, C. .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2008, 53 (1-2) :86-95
[8]   System boundary for embodied energy in buildings: A conceptual model for definition [J].
Dixit, Manish K. ;
Culp, Charles H. ;
Fernandez-Solis, Jose L. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 21 :153-164
[9]   Relative productivity in the AEC industries in the United States for on-site and off-site activities [J].
Eastman, Charles M. ;
Sacks, Rafael .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 2008, 134 (07) :517-526
[10]   Future opportunities for offsite in the UK [J].
Goodier, Chris ;
Gibb, Alistair .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2007, 25 (06) :585-595