Evaluation of a multiplex PCR kit for detection of 17 respiratory pathogens in hospitalized patients

被引:2
作者
Zhang, Cuiping [1 ]
Chen, Xiaoyan [1 ]
Wang, Lu [1 ]
Song, Juan [1 ]
Zhou, Chunmei [2 ]
Wang, Xiaohuan [2 ]
Ma, Yan [2 ]
Chen, Cuicui [1 ]
Guo, Wei [2 ]
Song, Yuanlin [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Pulm Med, Shanghai Key Lab Lung Inflammat & Injury, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Zhongshan Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Inst Infect Dis & Biosecur, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Resp Res Inst, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Fudan Univ, Huashan Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Aging & Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[6] Fudan Univ, Jinshan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR); pathogen detection; rapid diagnostics; molecular diagnostics; pneumonia; COMMUNITY-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA; STENOTROPHOMONAS-MALTOPHILIA; STREPTOCOCCUS-PNEUMONIAE; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.21037/jtd-22-544
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Rapid pathogen identification is critical for optimizing diagnosis and treatment of infectious diseases. Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a sensitive, broad-spectrum molecular detection technique that is simple and rapid to perform. It is capable of simultaneously screening for multiple pathogens within a short time range. Here, we designed and evaluated a multiplex PCR kit for the identification of 17 common respiratory pathogens in clinical samples from hospitalized patients. Methods: A total of 452 samples from hospitalized patients, including 242 respiratory and 210 nonrespiratory samples, were analyzed for 13 bacteria and 4 fungi by a multiplex fluorescent PCR kit. The diagnostic performance of the kit was assessed by considering routine microbiology as the reference standard. Results: The overall positivity rate of the multiplex PCR kit was 86.9%, much higher than that noted on routine microbiology (56.9%). Furthermore, the co-infection detection rate was also significantly higher than that noted on routine microbiology (69.5% vs. 15.0%). Compared with routine microbiology, kit sensitivity was >90% for detection of most target bacteria, with a negative predictive value (NPV) of >99%, especially for detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis and Escherichia coli. The kit was noted to be particularly superior in identifying Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and Streptococcus pneumoniae as compared to routine microbiology. The multiplex PCR kit was noted to be less sensitive (33.3-59.6%) and more specific (93.9100.0%) for detection of mycobacteria and fungi. Conclusions: Our multiplex PCR kit offers a rapid and sensitive diagnosis of common bacterial pneumonia, although sensitivity for mycobacteria and fungi warrants enhancement. Further optimization includes minimizing false positivity and increasing relevance to clinical application.
引用
收藏
页码:3386 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Multiplex fluorescence quantitative PCR for the detection of eight bacterial pathogens of porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) [J].
Wu, Jingbo ;
Nan, Wenjin ;
Huang, Jiangiang ;
Peng, Guoliang ;
Hu, Honghui .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY & ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2021, 45 (03) :447-456
[22]   Evaluation of a multiplex PCR for bacterial pathogens applied to bronchoalveolar lavage [J].
Stralin, K. ;
Korsgaard, J. ;
Olcen, P. .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2006, 28 (03) :568-575
[23]   Evaluation of a Multiplex PCR Panel for the Microbiological Diagnosis of Pneumonia in Hospitalized Patients: Experience from an Academic Medical Center [J].
Zacharioudakis, Ioannis M. ;
Zervou, Fainareti N. ;
Dubrovskaya, Yanina ;
Inglima, Kenneth ;
See, Benjamin ;
Aguero-Rosenfeld, Maria .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 104 :354-360
[24]   Comparison of NxTAG Respiratory Pathogen Panel and Anyplex II RV16 Tests for Multiplex Detection of Respiratory Pathogens in Hospitalized Children [J].
Brotons, Pedro ;
Henares, Desiree ;
Latorre, Irene ;
Cepillo, Antonio ;
Launes, Cristian ;
Munoz-Almagro, Carmen .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 54 (12) :2900-2904
[25]   Multicenter Evaluation of the QIAstat-Dx and the BioFire Multiplex Panel Tests for the Detection of Respiratory Pathogens [J].
Gosert, Rainer ;
Koller, Roger ;
Meyer, Jakob ;
Draeger, Sarah ;
Ramette, Alban ;
Bingisser, Roland ;
Nickel, Christian H. ;
Bassetti, Stefano ;
Sutter, Sarah Tschudin ;
Keller, Peter M. ;
Bittel, Pascal ;
Leuzinger, Karoline .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2024, 96 (12)
[26]   Simultaneous Detection of Key Bacterial Pathogens Related to Pneumonia and Meningitis Using Multiplex PCR Coupled With Mass Spectrometry [J].
Zhang, Chi ;
Xiu, Leshan ;
Xiao, Yan ;
Xie, Zhengde ;
Ren, Lili ;
Peng, Junping .
FRONTIERS IN CELLULAR AND INFECTION MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 8
[27]   Establishment and evaluation of a rapid method for the detection of bacterial pneumonia in hospitalized patients via multiplex PCR-capillary electrophoresis (MPCE) [J].
Wang, Jie ;
Zhao, Pei ;
Zhao, Mengchuan ;
Zhang, Duoxiao ;
Chen, Shan ;
Liu, Ying ;
Gao, Yuan ;
Tie, Yanqing ;
Feng, Zhishan .
MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2024, 12 (11)
[28]   Evaluation of the multiplex PCR Allplex-GI assay in the detection of bacterial pathogens in diarrheic stool samples [J].
Martin, Ariadna ;
Perez-Ayala, Ana ;
Chaves, Fernando ;
Lora, David ;
Angeles Orellana, M. .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2018, 144 :33-36
[29]   Development of two real-time multiplex PCR assays for the detection and quantification of eight key bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract infections [J].
Gadsby, N. J. ;
McHugh, M. P. ;
Russell, C. D. ;
Mark, H. ;
Morris, A. Conway ;
Laurenson, I. F. ;
Hill, A. T. ;
Templeton, K. E. .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2015, 21 (08) :788.e1-788.e13
[30]   Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-time PCR Assay for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses in Clinical Specimens [J].
Rheem, Insoo ;
Park, Joowon ;
Kim, Tae-Hyun ;
Kim, Jong Wan .
ANNALS OF LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2012, 32 (06) :399-406