Defining and measuring multimorbidity: a systematic review of systematic reviews

被引:556
作者
Johnston, Marjorie C. [1 ]
Crilly, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Black, Corri [1 ,2 ]
Prescott, Gordon J. [1 ]
Mercer, Stewart W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Appl Hlth Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[2] NHS Grampian, Publ Hlth, Summerfield House, Aberdeen, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Gen Practice & Primary Care, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
关键词
QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PRIMARY-CARE; SOCIOECONOMIC DEPRIVATION; ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES; HEALTH-CARE; COMORBIDITY; DISEASES; INTERVENTION; PREVALENCE; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1093/eurpub/cky098
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Multimorbidity, the coexistence of multiple health conditions, is a growing public health challenge. Research and intervention development are hampered by the lack of consensus regarding defining and measuring multimorbidity. The aim of this systematic review was to pool the findings of systematic reviews examining definitions and measures of multimorbidity. Medline, Embase, PubMed and Cochrane were searched from database inception to February 2017. Two authors independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts and extracted data from the included papers. Disagreements were resolved with a third author. Reviews were quality assessed. Of six reviews, two focussed on definitions and four on measures. Multimorbidity was commonly defined as the presence of multiple diseases or conditions, often with a cut-off of two or more. One review developed a holistic definition including biopsychosocial and somatic factors as well as disease. Reviews recommended using measures validated for the outcome of interest. Disease counts are an alternative if no validated measure exists. To enable comparison between studies and settings, researchers and practitioners should be explicit about their choice of definition and measure. Using a cut-off of two or more conditions as part of the definition is widely adopted. Measure selection should be based on tools validated for the outcome being considered. Where there is no validated measure, or where multiple outcomes or populations are being considered, disease counts are appropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 189
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Almirall Jose, 2013, J Comorb, V3, P4
[2]  
[Anonymous], CRIT APPR NOT CHECKL
[3]  
[Anonymous], MULT CLIN ASS MAN
[4]   Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study [J].
Barnett, Karen ;
Mercer, Stewart W. ;
Norbury, Michael ;
Watt, Graham ;
Wyke, Sally ;
Guthrie, Bruce .
LANCET, 2012, 380 (9836) :37-43
[5]   The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageing [J].
Beard, John R. ;
Officer, Alana ;
de Carvalho, Islene Araujo ;
Sadana, Ritu ;
Pot, Anne Margriet ;
Michel, Jean-Pierre ;
Lloyd-Sherlock, Peter ;
Epping-Jordan, JoAnne E. ;
Peeters, G. M. E. E. ;
Mahanani, Wahyu Retno ;
Thiyagarajan, Jotheeswaran Amuthavalli ;
Chatterji, Somnath .
LANCET, 2016, 387 (10033) :2145-2154
[6]   Relationship between socioeconomic status and quality of life in older adults: a path analysis [J].
Bielderman, A. ;
de Greef, M. H. G. ;
Krijnen, W. P. ;
van der Schans, C. P. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 24 (07) :1697-1705
[7]   Comparing measures of multimorbidity to predict outcomes in primary care: a cross sectional study [J].
Brilleman, Samuel L. ;
Salisbury, Chris .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2013, 30 (02) :172-178
[8]   Defying deprivation: A cross-sectional analysis of area level health resilience in England [J].
Cairns, J. M. ;
Curtis, S. E. ;
Bambra, C. .
HEALTH & PLACE, 2012, 18 (04) :928-933
[9]   Multimorbidity, polypharmacy, referrals, and adverse drug events: are we doing things well? [J].
Calderon-Larranaga, Amaia ;
Poblador-Plou, Beatriz ;
Gonzalez-Rubio, Francisca ;
Andres Gimeno-Feliu, Luis ;
Maria Abad-Diez, Jose ;
Prados-Torres, Alexandra .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2012, 62 (605) :e821-e826
[10]   How to measure comorbidity: a critical review of available methods [J].
de Groot, V ;
Beckerman, H ;
Lankhorst, GJ ;
Bouter, LM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 56 (03) :221-229