Xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix as a dermal substitute in rats

被引:15
作者
Srivastava, A
Jennings, LJ
Hanumadass, M
Sethi, S
DeSagun, E
Pavlis, N
Reyes, HM
Walter, RJ
机构
[1] Cook Cty Hosp, Hektoen Inst Med Res, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Wheaton Coll, Wheaton, IL 60187 USA
[3] Cook Cty Hosp, Dept Pathol, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Cook Cty Hosp, Dept Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[6] Rush Med Coll, Dept Gen Surg, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BURN CARE & REHABILITATION | 1999年 / 20卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00004630-199909000-00010
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) has been used as a dermal substitute for the treatment of deep burns, but the availability of cadaver skin for the production of ADM is limited. The usefulness of porcine ADM as a xenogeneic dermal substitute in rats was studied. With the use of Dispase II (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, Ind) and Triton X-100 (US Biochemicals, Cleveland, Ohio), xenogeneic ADM was prepared from commercially available, cryopreserved porcine skin, and allogeneic ADM from the rats was also prepared. Four full-thickness injuries 225 mm(2) in size were created on the dorsum of each rat. One of these wounds was treated with xenogeneic ADM, and 1 was treated with allogeneic ADM, and immediately a 0.005-in thick split-thickness skin graft was placed over the ADM. The other 2 wounds were covered with 0.005- or 0.017-in thick split-thickness skin grafts alone. The wounds were evaluated macro- and microscopically 10, 14, 20, and 30 days after grafting. At 30 days after grafting, contraction of the wounds that contained xenogeneic ADM was significantly greater than that of the wounds that contained allogeneic ADM. Craft take was poor in the wounds that contained xenogeneic ADM at 14 days after surgery and moderately good in those that contained allogeneic ADM. The use of thick autografts resulted in the best wound healing, whereas the use of thin autografts resulted in considerable wound contraction. Allogeneic ADM diminished this contraction, but wound healing was significantly worsened when xenogeneic ADM was used.
引用
收藏
页码:382 / 390
页数:9
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] XENOGENEIC TRANSPLANTATION - A REVIEW
    AUCHINCLOSS, H
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 1988, 46 (01) : 1 - 20
  • [2] BELL E, 1983, J INVEST DERMATOL, V81, P2
  • [3] COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF CULTURED SKIN SUBSTITUTES AND NATIVE SKIN AUTOGRAFT FOR TREATMENT OF FULL-THICKNESS BURNS
    BOYCE, ST
    GORETSKY, MJ
    GREENHALGH, DG
    KAGAN, RJ
    RIEMAN, MT
    WARDEN, GD
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1995, 222 (06) : 743 - 752
  • [4] STUDY OF EFFECTS OF PORCINE SKIN AND BOVINE DERMIS ON THE HEALING OF SPLIT-SKIN GRAFT DONOR SITES IN HUMANS
    BREACH, NM
    DAVIES, DM
    YIACOUMETTIS, A
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1979, 63 (04) : 546 - 549
  • [5] BROMBERG B E, 1965, Plast Reconstr Surg, V36, P80, DOI 10.1097/00006534-196507000-00011
  • [6] SUCCESSFUL USE OF A PHYSIOLOGICALLY ACCEPTABLE ARTIFICIAL SKIN IN THE TREATMENT OF EXTENSIVE BURN INJURY
    BURKE, JF
    YANNAS, IV
    QUINBY, WC
    BONDOC, CC
    JUNG, WK
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1981, 194 (04) : 413 - 428
  • [7] BOVINE COLLAGEN IMPLANT - HISTOLOGIC CHRONOLOGY IN PIG DERMIS
    BURKE, KE
    NAUGHTON, G
    WALDO, E
    CASSAI, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1983, 9 (11): : 889 - 895
  • [8] Organized skin structure is regenerated in vivo from collagen-GAG matrices seeded with autologous keratinocytes
    Compton, CC
    Butler, CE
    Yannas, IV
    Warland, G
    Orgill, DP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 110 (06) : 908 - 916
  • [9] USE OF CULTURED EPIDERMAL AUTOGRAFTS AND DERMAL ALLOGRAFTS AS SKIN REPLACEMENT AFTER BURN INJURY
    CUONO, C
    LANGDON, R
    MCGUIRE, J
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8490) : 1123 - 1124
  • [10] COMPOSITE AUTOLOGOUS-ALLOGENEIC SKIN REPLACEMENT - DEVELOPMENT AND CLINICAL-APPLICATION
    CUONO, CB
    LANGDON, R
    BIRCHALL, N
    BARTTELBORT, S
    MCGUIRE, J
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1987, 80 (04) : 626 - 635