Dissociating location-based and object-based cue validity effects in object-based attention

被引:13
作者
Chou, Wei-Lun [1 ]
Yeh, Su-Ling [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Fo Guang Univ, Dept Psychol, Yilan, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Psychol, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taiwan Univ, Grad Inst Brain & Mind Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ, Neurobiol & Cognit Sci Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ, Ctr Artificial Intelligence & Adv Robot, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Visual attention; Cue validity; Same-object advantage; VISUAL-ATTENTION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; NORMAL PARTICIPANTS; INHIBITION; ALLOCATION; MEMORY; RETURN; ORGANIZATION; INFORMATION; MODULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2017.11.008
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Encoding predictive information and allocating visual attention according to the probability distribution is one of the marvelous achievements of our visual system. Unlike previous studies on object-based attention in which the validity of location-based cues and that of object-based cues covaried, we differentiate the two and examine whether our visual system can calculate the usefulness of the cue based on, separately and independently, the probability distribution of location on one hand and object that contains multiple locations on the other. We adopted the cueing paradigm with the double-rectangle display (Egly, Driver, & Rafal, 1994) and manipulated cue validity with respect to a particular location or the object as a whole. Results showed a spatial-cueing effect when location-based cues were informative and a same-object advantage when object-based cues were informative. We thus demonstrate here that different kinds of cue validity (location-based vs. object-based) determine different attention effects respectively (spatial-cueing effect vs. object-based advantage).
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 41
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting [J].
Abrams, RA ;
Law, MB .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2000, 62 (04) :818-833
[2]   Objects of attention, objects of perception [J].
Avrahami, J .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1999, 61 (08) :1604-1612
[3]   Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model [J].
Behrmann, M ;
Zemel, RS ;
Mozer, MC .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1998, 24 (04) :1011-1036
[4]   Object-based attention with endogenous cuing and positional certainty [J].
Chen, Zhe ;
Cave, Kyle R. .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2008, 70 (08) :1435-1443
[5]   Distinct mechanisms subserve location- and object-based visual attention [J].
Chou, Wei-Lun ;
Yeh, Su-Ling ;
Chen, Chien-Chung .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 5
[6]   Object-based attention occurs regardless of object awareness [J].
Chou, Wei-Lun ;
Yeh, Su-Ling .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2012, 19 (02) :225-231
[7]   Subliminal spatial cues capture attention and strengthen between-object link [J].
Chou, Wei-Lun ;
Yeh, Su-Ling .
CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2011, 20 (04) :1265-1271
[8]   Location- and object-based inhibition of return are affected by different kinds of working memory [J].
Chou, Wei-Lun ;
Yeh, Su-Ling .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 61 (12) :1761-1768
[9]   Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention [J].
Chun, MM ;
Jian, YH .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 36 (01) :28-71
[10]  
Downing C.J., 1985, ATTENTION PERFORM, P171