Gaussian Process-Based Response Surface Method for Slope Reliability Analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Hu, Bin [1 ]
Su, Guo-shao [2 ]
Jiang, Jianqing [2 ,3 ]
Xiao, Yilong [2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Resource & Environm Engn, POB 430081, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Univ, Sch Civil & Architecture Engn, Minist Educ, Key Lab Disaster Prevent & Struct Safety, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Northeastern Univ, Minist Educ Safe Min Deep Met Mines, Key Lab, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
SEARCH ALGORITHM; INDEX;
D O I
10.1155/2019/9185756
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A new response surface method (RSM) for slope reliability analysis was proposed based on Gaussian process (GP) machine learning technology. The method involves the approximation of limit state function by the trained GP model and estimation of failure probability using the first-order reliability method (FORM). A small amount of training samples were firstly built by the limited equilibrium method for training the GP model. Then, the implicit limit state function of slope was approximated by the trained GP model. Thus, the implicit limit state function and its derivatives for slope stability analysis were approximated by the GP model with the explicit formulation. Furthermore, an iterative algorithm was presented to improve the precision of approximation of the limit state function at the region near the design point which contributes significantly to the failure probability. Results of four case studies including one nonslope and three slope problems indicate that the proposed method is more efficient to achieve reasonable accuracy for slope reliability analysis than the traditional RSM.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Gaussian process-based response surface method for structural reliability analysis
    Su, Guoshao
    Jiang, Jianqing
    Yu, Bo
    Xiao, Yilong
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND MECHANICS, 2015, 56 (04) : 549 - 567
  • [2] Gaussian process-based dynamic response surface method for estimating slope failure probability
    Su Guo-shao
    Zhao Wei
    Peng Li-feng
    Yan Liu-bin
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2014, 35 (12) : 3592 - 3601
  • [3] An intelligent response surface method for analyzing slope reliability based on Gaussian process regression
    Zhu, Bin
    Pei, Huafu
    Yang, Qing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 2019, 43 (15) : 2431 - 2448
  • [4] Gaussian process method for slope reliability analysis
    Su, Guo-Shao
    Xiao, Yi-Long
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33 (06): : 916 - 920
  • [5] Gaussian process regression-based response surface method and reliability analysis of slopes
    Zhu B.
    Pei H.-F.
    Yang Q.
    Yantu Gongcheng Xuebao/Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2019, 41 : 209 - 212
  • [6] Reliability Analysis of Suspension Bridge Using Gaussian Process Based Response Surface Method
    Zhao, Wei
    Su, Guo-shao
    Hu, Li-hua
    ENERGY DEVELOPMENT, PTS 1-4, 2014, 860-863 : 2970 - 2974
  • [7] Fast Analysis of Structural Reliability Using Gaussian Process Classification Based Dynamic Response Surface Method
    Peng, Lifeng
    Su, Guoshao
    Zhao, Wei
    ADVANCES IN CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING III, PTS 1-4, 2014, 501-504 : 1067 - 1070
  • [8] Gaussian process based dynamic response surface method and its application in reliability analysis for Suspension Bridge
    Su, Guo-Shao
    Zhao, Wei
    Yan, Liu-Bin
    Xiao, Yi-Long
    Luo, Yue-Jing
    Zhongguo Gonglu Xuebao/China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2013, 26 (06): : 87 - 95
  • [9] System reliability analysis of slope with stochastic response surface method
    Jiang Shui-hua
    Qi Xiao-hui
    Cao Zi-jun
    Li Dian-qing
    ROCK AND SOIL MECHANICS, 2015, 36 (03) : 809 - 818
  • [10] Reliability Analysis of Sensitive Clay Slope with the Response Surface Method
    Liu, Zhongqiang
    Choi, Jung Chan
    Nadim, Farrokh
    Lacasse, Suzanne
    PROCEEDINGS OF GEOSHANGHAI 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: GEOENVIRONMENT AND GEOHAZARD, 2018, : 63 - 72