Using Concha Electrodes to Measure Cochlear Microphonic Waveforms and Auditory Brainstem Responses

被引:12
作者
Zhang, Ming [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Rehabil Med, Dept Speech Pathol & Audiol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada
[2] Glenrose Rehabil Hosp, Alberta Hlth Serv, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
TRENDS IN AMPLIFICATION | 2010年 / 14卷 / 04期
基金
加拿大创新基金会;
关键词
concha electrode; ear canal electrode; electrocochleography (ECoG or ECochG); cochlear microphonics (CMs); auditory brainstem responses (ABRs);
D O I
10.1177/1084713810388811
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During electrocochleography, that is, ECochG or ECoG, a recording electrode can be placed in the ear canal lateral to the tympanic membrane. We designed a concha electrode to record both sinusoidal waveforms of cochlear microphonics (CMs) and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). The amplitudes of CM waveforms and Wave I or compound action potentials (CAPs) recorded at the concha were greater than those recorded at the mastoid but slightly lower than those recorded at the ear canal. Wave V amplitudes recorded at the concha were greater than those recorded at the ear canal but lower than those recorded at the mastoid. There was not a significant difference between the amplitudes recorded at the concha and at the ear canal. For CM and Wave I or CAP, the latency recorded at the concha was longer than at the canal but shorter than at the mastoid; for Wave V, the reverse was true. However, these differences were not statistically significant and may be due to the distance to response generators. Aside from the advantages that the regular ECoG has over otoacoustic emission (OAE) testing, the concha electrode was also easier and safer to place and may be suitable for children, newborn screening, participants with canal conditions, and remote clinics which could have concerns with the availability and cost of a canal electrode. Using concha electrodes, we also experienced fewer postauricular artifacts than when using a mastoid electrode.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 217
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Adrian E. D., 1931, P PHYSIOL SOC J PHYS, V71
[2]   Hearing preservation using combined monitoring of extra-tympanic electrocochleography and auditory brainstem responses during acoustic neuroma surgery [J].
Attias, Joseph ;
Nageris, Beni ;
Ralph, Jonathan ;
Vajda, Janush ;
Rappaport, Zvi Harry .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2008, 47 (04) :178-184
[3]   COMPARISON OF ABR AMPLITUDES WITH TIPTRODE AND MASTOID ELECTRODES [J].
BAUCH, CD ;
OLSEN, WO .
EAR AND HEARING, 1990, 11 (06) :463-467
[4]  
BEATTIE RC, 1990, AM J OTOL, V11, P314
[5]   LATENCY AND AMPLITUDE EFFECTS OF ELECTRODE PLACEMENT ON THE EARLY AUDITORY EVOKED-RESPONSE [J].
BEATTIE, RC ;
BEGUWALA, FE ;
MILLS, DM ;
BOYD, RL .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING DISORDERS, 1986, 51 (01) :63-70
[6]  
BEATTIE RC, 1989, AUDIOLOGY, V28, P1
[7]   Easily applied ear canal electrodes improve the diagnostic potential of auditory brainstem response [J].
Brantberg, K .
SCANDINAVIAN AUDIOLOGY, 1996, 25 (03) :147-152
[8]   Rehabilitation and outcome of severe profound deafness in a group of 16 infants affected by congenital cytomegalovirus infection [J].
Ciorba, Andrea ;
Bovo, Roberto ;
Trevisi, Patrizia ;
Bianchini, Chiara ;
Arboretti, Rosa ;
Martini, Alessandro .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2009, 266 (10) :1539-1546
[9]  
Dallos P., 1973, AUDITORY PERIPHERY B
[10]  
Eggermont J J, 1976, Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord), V97 Suppl, P487