A pharmacokinetic study of two modified-release methylphenidate formulations under different food conditions in healthy volunteers

被引:0
|
作者
Haessler, F. [2 ]
Tracik, F. [1 ]
Dietrich, H. [3 ]
Stammer, H. [4 ]
Klatt, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Pharma GmbH, D-90429 Nurnberg, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Rostock, Clin Child Psychiat Neurol Psychosomat & Psychoth, Rostock, Germany
[3] MEDA Mfg GmbH, ClinPharmCologne, Cologne, Germany
[4] Klin Forsch GmbH, Pharmalog Inst, Munich, Germany
关键词
Ritalin LA (R); Medikinet (R) retard; methylphenidate; bioequivalence; food-effect; pharmacokinetics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objectives: Primary objective was to investigate bioequivalence of Ritalin LA(R) 40 mg compared to Medikinet(R) retard 40 mg in healthy male volunteers under fasted and fed conditions. Secondary objectives included assessment of tolerability and determination of further pharmacokinetic parameters. The difference between the kinetic profiles of Ritalin LA(R) and Medikinet(R) retard with respect to breakfast intake was additionally explored. Methods: 28 subjects were randomized in this open-label, four-treatment, cross-over-design study. Pharmacokinetic evaluations included AUC((0-inf)), C-max, t(max), elimination half life (t(1/2)) and mean residence time (MRT(0-inf)). The relative bioavailability of Ritalin LA(R) and Medikinet(R) retard and the food effect were assessed using a 90% confidence interval (CI) based on the lower and upper endpoints of the CI for the ratios of the geometric means being within the 80 - 125% equivalence criterion. Results: 25 volunteers completed all treatment arms. Frequency of adverse events were comparable for all treatments. Under fasted condition Ritalin LA(R) showed a consistent bimodal concentration time profile with two t(max) peaks. Medikinet(R) retard showed a steady absorption with a single t(max) peak. The point estimators for AUC((0-inf)) and C-max were found to be 99.7% and 85.9%, respectively. Under fed condition both Ritalin LA(R) and Medikinet(R) retard showed a bimodal concentration time profile with two t(max) peaks. The point estimators for AUC((0-inf)) and C-max were estimated as 89.8% and 68.6%, respectively. Conclusions: Both methylphenidate formulations were safe and well tolerated. Ritalin LA(R) and Medikinet(R) retard were bioequivalent in fasted state but not in fed state. Only Ritalin LA(R) had a biphasic kinetic profile under both fasted and fed conditions. This difference in the kinetic profiles might be of clinical relevance and might offer a potential advantage of Ritalin LA(R).
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 476
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pharmacokinetic comparison and evaluation of food effect of two modified release methylphenidate formulations in healthy male volunteers
    Klatt, J.
    Haessler, F.
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION, 2007, 114 (07) : XCII - XCII
  • [2] Pharmacokinetic and bioequivalent study of diltiazem modified-release formulation in healthy volunteers
    Khaksa, G
    Mahmoudian, M
    Khosravi, A
    Emame, M
    NAUNYN-SCHMIEDEBERGS ARCHIVES OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 358 (01) : R404 - R404
  • [3] Pharmacokinetics of Methylphenidate After Oral Administration of Two Modified-Release Formulations in Healthy Adults
    John S. Markowitz
    Arthur B. Straughn
    Kennerly S. Patrick
    C. Lindsay DeVane
    Linda Pestreich
    James Lee
    Yanfeng Wang
    Rafael Muniz
    Clinical Pharmacokinetics, 2003, 42 : 393 - 401
  • [4] Pharmacokinetics of methylphenidate after oral administration of two modified-release formulations in healthy adults
    Markowitz, JS
    Straughn, AB
    Patrick, KS
    DeVane, CL
    Pestreich, L
    Lee, J
    Wang, YF
    Muniz, R
    CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 2003, 42 (04) : 393 - 401
  • [5] Lack of bioequivalence between two methylphenidate extended modified release formulations in healthy volunteers
    Schuetz, H.
    Fischer, R.
    Grossmann, M.
    Mazur, D.
    Leis, H. J.
    Ammer, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 47 (12) : 761 - 769
  • [6] Relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic study of two trimetazidine modified release formulations in healthy Bangladeshi male volunteers
    Chowdhury, Md. Mazharul Islam
    Ullah, Md. Ashik
    Iqbal, Naushin
    Al Maruf, Abdullah
    Shohag, Md. Hasanuzzaman
    Harun, Saima
    Akter, Khondker Ayesha
    Begum, Bilkis
    Latif, A. H. M. Mahbub
    Hasnat, Abul
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2011, 61 (07): : 393 - 398
  • [7] PHARMACOKINETIC AND SAFETY EVALUATION OF TWO DIFFERENT FORMULATIONS OF MEGESTROL ACETATE IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS UNDER FASTING AND FED CONDITIONS
    Yoon, S.
    Shin, D.
    Kim, S.
    Cho, J.
    Yoon, S.
    Yu, K.
    Chung, J.
    CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2013, 93 : S115 - S115
  • [8] Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Study of Two Different Omeprazole Capsule Formulations in Healthy Bangladeshi Volunteers
    Joti, Jafreen Jamal
    Nahar, Kamrun
    Hasan, Ahasanul
    Azad, Mohammad Abul Kalam
    Ullah, Md. Ashik
    Islam, S. M. Ashraful
    Hasnat, Abul
    ARZNEIMITTELFORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH, 2009, 59 (04): : 171 - 175
  • [9] Pharmacokinetic analysis of modified-release metoprolol formulations: An interspecies comparison
    De Thaye, Elien
    Vervaeck, Anouk
    Marostica, Eleonora
    Remon, Jean Paul
    Van Bocxlaer, Jan
    Vervaet, Chris
    Vermeulen, An
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 97 : 135 - 142
  • [10] Comparison of two marketed nifedipine modified-release formulations:: An exploratory clinical food interaction study
    Wonnemann, Meinolf
    Schug, Barbara
    Anschuetz, Maria
    Brendel, Erich
    De Nucci, Gilberto
    Blume, Henning
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 30 (01) : 48 - 58