Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Diabetic Macular Edema with Prompt versus Deferred Laser Treatment Three-Year Randomized Trial Results

被引:276
作者
Elman, Michael J. [2 ]
Qin, Haijing [1 ]
Aiello, Lloyd Paul [3 ]
Beck, Roy W. [1 ]
Bressler, Neil M. [4 ]
Ferris, Frederick L., III [5 ]
Glassman, Adam R. [1 ]
Maturi, Raj K.
Melia, Michele [1 ]
机构
[1] Jaeb Ctr Hlth Res, Tampa, FL 33647 USA
[2] Elman Retina Grp, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Joslin Diabet Ctr, Beetham Eye Inst,Dept Ophthalmol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Wilmer Eye Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[5] NEI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
PLUS PROMPT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.08.022
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Objective: To report the 3-year follow-up results within a previously reported randomized trial evaluating prompt versus deferred (for >= 24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment in eyes treated with intravitreal 0.5 mg ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema (DME). Design: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial. Participants: Three hundred sixty-one participants with visual acuity of 20/32 to 20/320 (approximate Snellen equivalent) and DME involving the fovea. Methods: Ranibizumab every 4 weeks until no longer improving (with resumption if worsening) and random assignment to prompt or deferred (>= 24 weeks) focal/grid laser treatment. Main Outcome Measures: Best-corrected visual acuity and safety at the 156-week (3-year) visit. Results: The estimated mean change in visual acuity letter score from baseline through the 3-year visit was 2.9 letters more (9.7 vs. 6.8 letters; mean difference, 2.9 letters; 95% confidence interval, 0.4-5.4 letters; P = 0.02) in the deferral group compared with the prompt laser treatment group. In the prompt laser treatment group and deferral group, respectively, the percentage of eyes with a >= 10-letter gain/loss was 42% and 56% (P = 0.02), whereas the respective percentage of eyes with a >= 10-letter gain/loss was 10% and 5% (P = 0.12). Up to the 3-year visit, the median numbers of injections were 12 and 15 in the prompt and deferral groups, respectively (P = 0.007), including 1 and 2 injections, respectively, from the 2-year up to the 3-year visit. At the 3-year visit, the percentages of eyes with central subfield thickness of 250 mu m or more on time-domain optical coherence tomography were 36% in both groups (P = 0.90). In the deferral group, 54% did not receive laser treatment during the trial. Systemic adverse events seemed to be similar in the 2 groups. Conclusions: These 3-year results suggest that focal/grid laser treatment at the initiation of intravitreal ranibizumab is no better, and possibly worse, for vision outcomes than deferring laser treatment for 24 weeks or more in eyes with DME involving the fovea and with vision impairment. Some of the observed differences in visual acuity at 3 years may be related to fewer cumulative ranibizumab injections during follow-up in the prompt laser treatment group. Follow-up through 5 years continues. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology 2012;119:2312-2318 (C) 2012 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
引用
收藏
页码:2312 / 2318
页数:7
相关论文
共 4 条
  • [1] Expanded 2-Year Follow-up of Ranibizumab Plus Prompt or Deferred Laser or Triamcinolone Plus Prompt Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema
    Elman, Michael J.
    Bressler, Neil M.
    Qin, Haijing
    Beck, Roy W.
    Ferris, Frederick L., III
    Friedman, Scott M.
    Glassman, Adam R.
    Scott, Ingrid U.
    Stockdale, Cynthia R.
    Sun, Jennifer K.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 118 (04) : 609 - 614
  • [2] Randomized Trial Evaluating Ranibizumab Plus Prompt or Deferred Laser or Triamcinolone Plus Prompt Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema
    Elman, Michael J.
    Aiello, Lloyd Paul
    Beck, Roy W.
    Bressler, Neil M.
    Bressler, Susan B.
    Edwards, Allison R.
    Ferris, Frederick L., III
    Friedman, Scott M.
    Glassman, Adam R.
    Miller, Kellee M.
    Scott, Ingrid U.
    Stockdale, Cynthia R.
    Sun, Jennifer K.
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2010, 117 (06) : 1064 - U65
  • [3] Ranibizumab and Bevacizumab for Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
    Martin, Daniel F.
    Maguire, Maureen G.
    Fine, Stuart L.
    Ying, Gui-shuang
    Jaffe, Glenn J.
    Grunwald, Juan E.
    Toth, Cynthia
    Redford, Maryann
    Ferris, Frederick L., III
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2012, 119 (07) : 1388 - 1398
  • [4] Verbeke G, 2000, SPRINGER SERIES STAT, P55