PERFORMANCE EVALUATION MODEL OF ROMANIAN MANUFACTURING LISTED COMPANIES BY FUZZY AHP AND TOPSIS

被引:37
作者
Ban, Adrian Joan [1 ]
Ban, Olimpia Juliana [2 ]
Bogdan, Victoria [3 ]
Popa, Diana Claudia Sabau [3 ]
Tuse, Delia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oradea, Dept Math & Informat, Fac Sci, Oradea, Romania
[2] Oradea, Fac Econ Sci, Dept Business Econ, Oradea, Romania
[3] Univ Oradea, Fac Econ Sci, Dept Finance & Accounting, Univ St 1-5, Oradea, Romania
关键词
manufacturing company; indicator; performance; evaluation; fuzzy sets; FAHP; TOPSIS; hierarchy; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; SELECTION; FIRMS; BSC; COMPETITIVENESS; FRAMEWORK; LOCATION;
D O I
10.3846/tede.2020.12367
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We are interested in the hierarchy of the main Romanian companies in the manufacturing industry by considering eight financial and seven non-financial indicators. Thirty three listed companies, that are non-financial institutions, were selected for the study and in order to control the reliability of the data we used the Bucharest Stock Exchange database, official data published by the Romanian Ministry of Public Finance, and the annual reports released by the companies on their websites, collecting information for the years 2011-2015. Because the human thinking is subjective and ambiguous we prefer linguistic variables, converted afterwards in triangular fuzzy numbers, to represent the importance of indicators. Our method involves the calculation of the weights of individual or categories of indicators based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Then, the level of performance for each company, separately for financial, non-financial and all indicators is obtained by TOPSIS method. We deduce an objective hierarchy of the companies on a rigorous basis, which is however dependent from the choice of indicators and the conversion scale of linguistic variables into triangular fuzzy numbers. Also, following the obtained results we concluded that the overall performance of companies for the analyzed period is significantly influenced by non-financial indicators.
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 836
页数:29
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]   Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process: A performance analysis of various algorithms [J].
Ahmed, Faran ;
Kilic, Kemal .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2019, 362 :110-128
[2]  
Ahmed F, 2015, 2015 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (IESM), P435, DOI 10.1109/IESM.2015.7380193
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, MECHANICS, DOI [DOI 10.5755/J01.EE.24.5.4526, DOI 10.5755/J01.MECH.4.24.20721]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CASP J APPL SCI RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2011, INT J MATH MODELS ME
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, LIFE SCI J
[7]   Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment [J].
Aydogan, Emel Kizilkaya .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (04) :3992-3998
[8]   Simplifying the Search for Effective Ranking of Fuzzy Numbers [J].
Ban, Adrian I. ;
Coroianu, Lucian .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2015, 23 (02) :327-339
[9]   Optimization and extensions of a fuzzy multicriteria decision making method and applications to selection of touristic destinations [J].
Ban, Adrian I. ;
Ban, Olimpia I. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (08) :7216-7225
[10]   IFRS adoption, reporting incentives and financial reporting quality in private firms [J].
Bassemir, Moritz ;
Novotny-Farkas, Zoltan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, 2018, 45 (7-8) :759-796