Surface characteristics and fatigue behavior of shot peened Inconel 718

被引:148
作者
Klotz, T. [1 ]
Delbergue, D. [1 ,2 ]
Bocher, P. [2 ]
Levesque, M. [1 ]
Brochu, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech Montreal, Dept Genie Mecan, Montreal, PQ H3T 1J4, Canada
[2] Ecole Technol Super, Dept Genie Mecan, Montreal, PQ H3C 1K3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Inconel; 718; Fatigue; Crack initiation; Shot peening; Residual stresses relaxation; NICKEL-BASED SUPERALLOY; CRACK INITIATION SITES; STEEL; LIFE; TWIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.01.005
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Shot peening is commonly used in the aerospace industry to improve mechanical components fatigue life. It introduces compressive residual stresses and cold work at the surface which tend to close short fatigue cracks and delay their propagation, respectively. However, shot peening also creates surface irregularities that can be detrimental to fatigue. The effect of different shot peening conditions on Inconel 718 tested in low and high cycle fatigue is presented in this study. An analysis of the fatigue life, crack initiation mechanisms, residual stress relaxation, process induced strain hardening and surface roughness showed that, in high cycle fatigue, shot peening can increase Inconel 718 fatigue life from 2 to 20 times, depending on the shot peening conditions. This observation suggests that careful selection of peening parameters is crucial. In low cycle fatigue the roughness resulting from shot peening is to be considered while in high cycle fatigue, it is the presence of significant residual stresses.
引用
收藏
页码:10 / 21
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Abramovich F., 2013, STAT THEORY CONCISE
  • [2] Modelling the optimum grain size on the low cycle fatigue life of a Ni based superalloy in the presence of two possible crack initiation sites
    Alexandre, F
    Deyber, S
    Pineau, A
    [J]. SCRIPTA MATERIALIA, 2004, 50 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, AMS5663M SAE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, E8M13A ASTM
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, AMS2430T SAE
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2011, E38411 ASTM
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2007, E466 07 STAND PRACT
  • [8] Bianchetti C, 2017, SUB INT J FATIGU NOV
  • [9] Cammett JT, 2005, TECH REP
  • [10] Delbergue D, 2016, MAT RES P, P2