The circuit parameters measurement of the SABALAN-I plasma focus facility and comparison with Lee Model

被引:3
作者
Karimi, F. S. [1 ]
Saviz, S. [1 ]
Ghoranneviss, M. [1 ]
Salem, M. K. [1 ]
Aghamir, F. M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Plasma Phys Res Ctr, Sci & Res Branch, Tehran 1477893855, Iran
[2] Univ Tehran, Dept Phys, N Kargar Ave, Tehran 14399, Iran
关键词
Plasma focus; Short circuit; High pressure; Rogowski coil; Circuit parameters; Lee Model; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rinp.2017.05.021
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The circuit parameters are investigated in a Mather-type plasma focus device. The experiments are performed in the SABALAN-I plasma focus facility (2 kJ, 20 kV, 10 mF). A 12-turn Rogowski coil is built and used to measure the time derivative of discharge current (dI/dt). The high pressure test has been performed in this work, as alternative technique to short circuit test to determine the machine circuit parameters and calibration factor of the Rogowski coil. The operating parameters are calculated by two methods and the results show that the relative error of determined parameters by method I, are very low in comparison to method II. Thus the method I produces more accurate results than method II. The high pressure test is operated with this assumption that no plasma motion and the circuit parameters may be estimated using R-L-C theory given that C0 is known. However, for a plasma focus, even at highest permissible pressure it is found that there is significant motion, so that estimated circuit parameters not accurate. So the Lee Model code is used in short circuit mode to generate the computed current trace for fitting to the current waveform was integrated from current derivative signal taken with Rogowski coil. Hence, the dynamics of plasma is accounted for into the estimation and the static bank parameters are determined accurately. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B. V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license
引用
收藏
页码:1859 / 1869
页数:11
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Comparison of Measured Soft X-Ray Yield Versus Pressure for NX1 and NX2 Plasma Focus Devices Against Computed Values Using Lee Model Code
    P. Gautam
    R. Khanal
    S. H. Saw
    S. Lee
    Journal of Fusion Energy, 2015, 34 : 686 - 693
  • [22] Comparison of Measured Neutron Yield Versus Pressure Curves for FMPF-3, NX2 and NX3 Plasma Focus Machines Against Computed Results Using the Lee Model Code
    Saw, S. H.
    Lee, P.
    Rawat, R. S.
    Verma, R.
    Subedi, D.
    Khanal, R.
    Gautam, P.
    Shrestha, R.
    Singh, A.
    Lee, S.
    JOURNAL OF FUSION ENERGY, 2015, 34 (03) : 474 - 479
  • [23] Comparison of Measured Neutron Yield Versus Pressure Curves for FMPF-3, NX2 and NX3 Plasma Focus Machines Against Computed Results Using the Lee Model Code
    S. H. Saw
    P. Lee
    R. S. Rawat
    R. Verma
    D. Subedi
    R. Khanal
    P. Gautam
    R. Shrestha
    A. Singh
    S. Lee
    Journal of Fusion Energy, 2015, 34 : 474 - 479
  • [24] Inference of X-Ray Emission From a Plasma Focus Discharge: Comparison Between Characteristic Parameters and Neural Network Analyses
    Orellana, Luis
    Avaria, Gonzalo
    Ardila-Rey, Jorge
    Davis, Sergio
    Schurch, Roger
    Pavez, Cristian
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 79273 - 79286
  • [25] Numerical experiments on the total D-D fusion neutron yield versus deuterium pressure for different energy plasma focus devices using the Lee model code
    Wahbe, S.
    Abou-Ali, Y.
    Akel, M.
    Lee, S.
    Marciniak, L.
    PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 2023, 65 (05)
  • [26] Measurement of high x-ray doses from PF1000 plasma focus using Si p-i-n detectors
    Ryc, L
    Bienkowska, B
    Borowrecki, M
    Ivanova-Stanik, I
    Kaczmarczyk, J
    Paduch, M
    Scholz, M
    Tomaszewski, K
    Krása, J
    Kravárik, J
    Kubes, P
    CZECHOSLOVAK JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2004, 54 : 326 - 333