Parecoxib, propacetamol, and their combination for analgesia after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized non-inferiority trial

被引:25
作者
Camu, F. [1 ]
Borgeat, A. [2 ]
Heylen, R. J. [3 ,4 ]
Viel, E. J. [5 ,6 ]
Boye, M. E. [7 ]
Cheung, R. Y. [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Brussels, Dept Anesthesiol, Brussels, Belgium
[2] Uniklin Balgrist, Dept Anesthesiol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Dept Anesthesia Intens Care Emergency Care, Genk, Belgium
[4] Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Ctr Multidisciplinary Pain, Genk, Belgium
[5] Reg Univ Hosp Caremeau Nimes, Dept Anesthesiol Intens Care Emergency Med & Pain, Pain Clin, Montpellier, France
[6] Fac Med Montpellier Nimes, Montpellier, France
[7] Pfizer Inc, Outcomes Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[8] Pfizer Inc, Global Med Team, New York, NY USA
关键词
NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF; DOUBLE-BLIND; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; NONCARDIAC SURGERY; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; ADVERSE EVENTS; MAJOR SURGERY; PARACETAMOL; ACETAMINOPHEN;
D O I
10.1111/aas.12841
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: This study assessed non-inferiority of parecoxib vs. combination parecoxib+propacetamol and compared the opioid-sparing effects of parecoxib, propacetamol, and parecoxib+propacetamol vs. placebo after total hip arthroplasty. Methods: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority study, patients received one of four IV treatments after surgery: parecoxib 40 mg bid (n = 72); propacetamol 2 g qid (n = 71); parecoxib 40 mg bid plus propacetamol 2 g qid (n = 72); or placebo (n = 38) with supplemental IV patient-controlled analgesia (morphine). Patients and investigators were blinded to treatment. Pain intensity at rest and with movement was assessed regularly, together with functional recovery (modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form) and opioid-related side effects (Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale) questionnaires up to 48 h. Results: After 24 h, cumulative morphine consumption was reduced by 59.8% (P < 0.001), 38.9% (P < 0.001), and 26.8% (P = 0.005) in the parecoxib+propacetamol, parecoxib, and propacetamol groups, respectively, compared with placebo. Parecoxib did not meet criteria for non-inferiority to parecoxib+propacetamol. Parecoxib+propacetamol and parecoxib significantly reduced least-squares mean pain intensity scores at rest and with movement compared with propacetamol (P < 0.05). One day after surgery, parecoxib+propacetamol significantly reduced opioid-related symptom distress and decreased pain interference with function compared with propacetamol or placebo. Conclusion: Parecoxib and parecoxib+propacetamol provided significant opioid-sparing efficacy compared with placebo; non-inferiority of parecoxib to parecoxib+propacetamol was not demonstrated. Opioid-sparing efficacy was accompanied by significant reductions in pain intensity on movement, improved functional outcome, and less opioid-related symptom distress. Study medications were well tolerated.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 110
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Abdulla Susanne, 2012, Middle East Journal of Anesthesiology, V21, P543
[2]   Intravenous acetaminophen reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Apfel, Christian C. ;
Turan, Alparslan ;
Souza, Kimberly ;
Pergolizzi, Joseph ;
Hornuss, Cyrill .
PAIN, 2013, 154 (05) :677-689
[3]   Reliability and validity of the perioperative opioid-related symptom distress scale [J].
Apfelbaum, JL ;
Gan, TJ ;
Zhao, S ;
Hanna, DB ;
Chen, C .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (03) :699-709
[4]   Randomised, placebo-controlled study of the postoperative analgesic effects of ketoprofen after spinal fusion surgery [J].
Aubrun, F ;
Langeron, O ;
Heitz, D ;
Coriat, P ;
Riou, B .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 44 (08) :934-939
[5]   Adjunctive analgesia with intravenous propacetamol does not reduce morphine-related adverse effects [J].
Aubrun, F ;
Kalfon, F ;
Mottet, P ;
Bellanger, A ;
Langeron, O ;
Coriat, P ;
Riou, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2003, 90 (03) :314-319
[6]   Efficacy and safety of intravenous parecoxib sodium in relieving acute postoperative pain following gynecologic laparotomy surgery [J].
Barton, SF ;
Langeland, FF ;
Snabes, MC ;
LeComte, D ;
Kuss, ME ;
Dhadda, SS ;
Hubbard, RC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 97 (02) :306-314
[7]   A randomized, double-blind comparison between parecoxib sodium and propacetamol for parenteral postoperative analgesia after inguinal hernia repair in adult patients [J].
Beaussier, M ;
Weickmans, H ;
Paugam, C ;
Lavazais, S ;
Baechle, JP ;
Goater, P ;
Buffin, A ;
Loriferne, JF ;
Perier, JF ;
Didelot, JP ;
Mosbah, A ;
Said, R ;
Lienhart, A .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 100 (05) :1309-1315
[8]   Mechanism of action of acetaminophen: Is there a cyclooxygenase 3? [J].
Botting, RM .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 31 :S202-S210
[9]   Efficacy of intravenous paracetamol compared to dipyrone and parecoxib for postoperative pain management after minor-to-intermediate surgery: a randomised, double-blind trial [J].
Brodner, Gerhard ;
Gogarten, Wiebke ;
Van Aken, Hugo ;
Hahnenkamp, Klaus ;
Wempe, Carola ;
Freise, Hendrik ;
Cosanne, Irmgard ;
Huppertz-Thyssen, Markus ;
Ellger, Bjoern .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2011, 28 (02) :125-132
[10]  
Camu Frederic, 2002, Am J Ther, V9, P43, DOI 10.1097/00045391-200201000-00009