A prospective study of transperineal prostatic block for transurethral needle ablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: The Emory University experience

被引:17
作者
Issa, MM [1 ]
Perez-Brayfield, M
Petros, JA
Anastasia, K
Labadia, AJ
Miller, LE
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Atlanta Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Decatur, GA USA
关键词
prostatic hyperplasia; prostatic neoplasms; thermal therapy; anesthesia;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68185-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness and role of transperineal prostate block in providing anesthesia during minimally invasive radio frequency thermal therapy of the prostate. Materials and Methods: A total of 38 consecutive patients undergoing transurethral needle ablation for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia were entered in this prospective study. All patients received transperineal prostatic block as the main method of anesthesia. A mixture of equal volumes of 1% lidocaine and 0.25% bupivacaine, each with epinephrine (1:100,000 concentration ratio) was used. Pain control during the instillation of transperineal prostatic block and transurethral needle ablation was assessed using a 10-point linear analog pain scale and questionnaire. Results: Median patient age was 65.5 years (range 47 to 79), with 21% of men in the eighth decade of life. Median American Urological Association symptom score was 25.0 (range 14 to 35), bother score was 20.0 (11 to 28), quality of life score was 4.0 (3 to 6) and peak urinary flow rate was 8.9 cc per second (3.5 to 15.7). Median sonographic prostate volume was 35.0 cc (range 17 to 129). Median volume of anesthetic agent used was 40.0 cc (range 30 to 60) per case (1.1 cc solution per 1 cc prostate tissue). No adverse events were encountered. Median pain score was 3.3 (range 1 to 6) during instillation of transperineal prostatic block and 1.0 (0 to 6) during transurethral needle ablation. Transperineal prostatic block proved highly effective and was a satisfactory method of anesthesia during transurethral needle ablation as judged by postoperative questionnaire. No sedation, narcotic or analgesia was required. All procedures were performed in the outpatient cystoscopy suite or office setting without support of an anesthesia team or conscious sedation monitoring. Conclusions: Transperineal prostatic block is a safe, convenient, effective and satisfactory method of minimally invasive anesthesia for transurethral needle ablation of the prostate in an outpatient office setting. Elderly patients and those at high surgical risk can be treated safely using this approach. Considerable cost saving is seen secondary to omission of charges related to anesthesia team support, recovery room facility and conscious sedation monitoring.
引用
收藏
页码:1636 / 1639
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 980-Nm Diode Laser Vaporization versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Controlled Study
    Cetinkaya, Mehmet
    Onem, Kadir
    Rifaioglu, Mehmet Murat
    Yalcin, Veli
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2015, 12 (05) : 2355 - 2361
  • [42] Transurethral evaporation of the prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Results in 168 patients with up to 12 months of followup
    Narayan, P
    Tewari, A
    Schalow, E
    Leidich, R
    Aboseif, S
    Cascione, C
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 157 (04) : 1309 - 1312
  • [43] Prospective Study of Serum Dihydrotestosterone and Subsequent Risk of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Community Dwelling Men: The Rancho Bernardo Study
    Parsons, J. Kellogg
    Palazzi-Churas, Kerrin
    Bergstrom, Jaclyn
    Barrett-Connor, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (03) : 1040 - 1044
  • [44] Serum Sodium and Potassium Concentration Imbalance in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia following Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)
    Ahmed, Syed Farhan
    Memon, Imran Idrees
    Rashid, Muhammad
    Asim, Muhammad
    Ahmed, Waqas
    Abdullah, Aziz
    ANNALS ABBASI SHAHEED HOSPITAL & KARACHI MEDICAL & DENTAL COLLEGE, 2019, 24 (03):
  • [45] Effect of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate on Storage Symptoms in Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia of Less than 30 ml
    Kang, Yu Jin
    Kim, Ki Ho
    Seo, Youngjin
    Lee, Kyung Seop
    WORLD JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2013, 31 (01) : 64 - 69
  • [46] Correlation between the international prostatic symptom score and a pressure-flow study in the evaluation of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Netto, NR
    DAncona, CAL
    deLima, ML
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 155 (01) : 200 - 202
  • [47] Anatomic study of verumontanum during endoscopic surgeries in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
    de Menezes, Henrique Barbosa
    Barcellos Sampaio, Francisco Jose
    Dutra de Resende Junior, Jose Anacleto
    Vieiralves, Rodrigo Ribeiro
    da Silva Filho, Fernando Salles
    Alves, Edilaine
    Favorito, Luciano Alves
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2021, 47 (02): : 308 - 321
  • [48] WATER: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Aquablation® vs Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Gilling, Peter
    Barber, Neil
    Bidair, Mohamed
    Anderson, Paul
    Sutton, Mark
    Aho, Tev
    Kramolowsky, Eugene
    Thomas, Andrew
    Cowan, Barrett
    Kaufman, Ronald P., Jr.
    Trainer, Andrew
    Arther, Andrew
    Badlani, Gopal
    Plante, Mark
    Desai, Mihir
    Doumanian, Leo
    Te, Alexis E.
    DeGuenther, Mark
    Roehrborn, Claus
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 199 (05) : 1252 - 1261
  • [49] Ultrasound-guided perineal laser ablation versus prostatic arterial embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: two similar short-term efficacies
    Cai, Huaijie
    Zhu, Conghui
    Fang, Jianhua
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2023, 64 (05) : 2033 - 2039
  • [50] Transurethral thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia significantly decreases infravesical obstruction: Results in 134 patients after 1 year
    Thalmann, GN
    Graber, SF
    Bitton, A
    Burkhard, FC
    Gruenig, O
    Studer, UE
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (02) : 387 - 393