Location of the ovaries in girls from newborn to 18 years of age: reconsidering ovarian shielding

被引:34
作者
Bardo, Dianna M. E. [1 ]
Black, Michelle [2 ]
Schenk, Kellie [1 ]
Zaritzky, Mario F. [3 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] NYU, Sch Med, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ Chicago, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
Ovarian shields; Radiation dose; Radiation protection; RADIATION-DOSE REDUCTION; CT; POPULATION; EXPOSURE; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s00247-008-1094-4
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Guidelines for ovarian shielding are to place a lead shield in the midline of the abdomen at the level of the umbilicus. However, the ovaries are routinely seen at other locations on all types of imaging examinations. To determine the position of the ovaries in girls, newborn to 18 years of age, in order to assess efficacy of ovarian shield placement. We identified 336 girls who underwent lumbar spine and pelvic MRI. Images were reviewed noting the position of the ovaries relative to anatomic landmarks: symphysis pubis, iliac crest and anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). In 174 girls a total of 307 ovaries were visualized. The girls were divided into three age groups and analyzed together. Right and left ovaries were analyzed together. The mean, 95% confidence interval (CI), standard deviations and range were calculated. The ovaries lay at or below the iliac crest (the level of the umbilicus), most often just medial to the ASIS and above the pubic symphysis in girls of all ages. Current methods of shielding only the midline of the pelvis for the purpose of reducing radiation dose to the ovaries during radiographic imaging are ineffective given that the ovaries are almost always positioned laterally in the pelvis. Therefore current shielding techniques should be changed; lead ovarian shields should be placed in a lateral position or even abandoned if relevant anatomy will be obscured.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 259
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], RADIOGRAPHY ESSENTIA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2008, AAPM REP, DOI DOI 10.37206/97
  • [3] BONTRAGER KL, 2005, TXB RADIOGRAPHIC POS, P257
  • [4] *BRIT STAND I, BS4094 BSI 2
  • [5] Bushong SC, 2008, RADIOLOGIC SCI TECHN, P606
  • [6] DISAIA PJ, 1999, OBSTET GYNECOLOGY, P19
  • [7] Minimizing radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: Strategies at a large children's hospital
    Donnelly, LF
    Emery, KH
    Brody, AS
    Laor, T
    Gylys-Morin, VM
    Anton, CG
    Thomas, SR
    Frush, DP
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) : 303 - 306
  • [8] Doolan A., 2004, RADIOGRAPHY, V10, P15, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.RADI.2003.12.002
  • [9] Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography
    Einstein, Andrew J.
    Henzlova, Milena J.
    Rajagopalan, Sanjay
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 298 (03): : 317 - 323
  • [10] Computer-simulated radiation dose reduction for abdominal multidetector CT of pediatric patients
    Frush, DP
    Slack, CC
    Hollingsworth, CL
    Bisset, GS
    Donnelly, LF
    Hsieh, J
    Lavin-Wensell, T
    Mayo, JR
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2002, 179 (05) : 1107 - 1113