Dynamic variation and the fast acceleration of particles in Earth's radiation belt

被引:7
|
作者
Zong QiuGang [1 ,2 ]
Yuan ChongJing [1 ]
Wang YongFu [1 ]
Su ZhenPeng [3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Inst Space Phys & Appl Technol, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Sate Key Lab Space Weather, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Sci & Technol China, Sch Earth & Space Sci, Hefei 230026, Peoples R China
关键词
radiation belt; killer electrons; CME magnetic storm; CIR magnetic storm; wave-particle interaction; ULF wave; VLF wave; WHISTLER-MODE CHORUS; FREQUENCY GEOMAGNETIC-PULSATIONS; MULTI-SPACECRAFT OBSERVATIONS; RELATIVISTIC ELECTRON FLUX; CORONAL MASS EJECTIONS; INNER MAGNETOSPHERE; RESONANT INTERACTION; MAGNETIC-FIELD; GEOSYNCHRONOUS ORBIT; SUDDEN COMMENCEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11430-013-4644-z
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
We have quantitatively investigated the radiation belt's dynamic variations of 1.5-6.0 MeV electrons during 54 CME (coronal mass ejection)-driven storms from 1993 to 2003 and 26 CIR (corotating interaction region)-driven recurrent storms in 1995 by utilizing case and statistical studies based on the data from the SAMPEX satellite. It is found that the boundaries determined by fitting an exponential to the flux as a function of L shell obtained in this study agree with the observed outer and inner boundaries of the outer radiation belt. Furthermore, we have constructed the Radiation Belt Content (RBC) index by integrating the number density of electrons between those inner and outer boundaries. According to the ratio of the maximum RBC index during the recovery phase to the pre-storm average RBC index, we conclude that CME-driven storms produce more relativistic electrons than CIR-driven storms in the entire outer radiation belt, although the relativistic electron fluxes during CIR-related storms are much higher than those during CME-related storms at geosynchronous orbit. The physical radiation belt model STEERB is based on the three-dimensional Fokker-Planck equation and includes the physical processes of local wave-particle interactions, radial diffusion, and adiabatic transport. Due to the limitation of numerical schemes, formal radiation belt models do not include the cross diffusion term of local wave-particle interactions. The numerical experiments of STEERB have shown that the energetic electron fluxes can be overestimated by a factor of 5 or even several orders (depending on the pitch angle) if the cross diffusion term is ignored. This implies that the cross diffusion term is indispensable for the evaluation of radiation belt electron fluxes. Formal radiation belt models often adopt dipole magnetic field; the time varying Hilmer-Voigt geomagnetic field was adopted by the STEERB model, which self-consistently included the adiabatic transport process. The test simulations clearly indicate that the adiabatic process can significantly affect the evolution of radiation belt electrons. The interactions between interplanetary shocks and magnetosphere can excite ULF waves in the inner magnetosphere; the excited polodial mode ULF wave can cause the fast acceleration of "killer electrons". The acceleration mechanism of energetic electrons by poloidal and toroidal mode ULF wave is different at different L shells. The acceleration of energetic electrons by the toroidal mode ULF waves becomes important in the region with a larger L shell (the outer magnetosphere); in smaller L shell regions (the inner magnetosphere), the poloidal mode ULF becomes responsible for the acceleration of energetic electrons.
引用
收藏
页码:1118 / 1140
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The effects of magnetospheric processes on relativistic electron dynamics in the Earth's outer radiation belt
    Tang, C. L.
    Wang, Y. X.
    Ni, B.
    Su, Z. P.
    Reeves, G. D.
    Zhang, J. -C.
    Baker, D. N.
    Spence, H. E.
    Funsten, H. O.
    Blake, J. B.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2017, 122 (10) : 9952 - 9968
  • [22] Butterfly distribution of Earth's radiation belt relativistic electrons induced by dayside chorus
    JIN YuYue
    YANG Chang
    HE YiHua
    LIU Si
    ZHOU QingHua
    XIAO FuLiang
    Science China Technological Sciences, 2018, 61 (02) : 212 - 218
  • [23] Butterfly distribution of Earth's radiation belt relativistic electrons induced by dayside chorus
    Jin YuYue
    Yang Chang
    He YiHua
    Liu Si
    Zhou QingHua
    Xiao FuLiang
    SCIENCE CHINA-TECHNOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 61 (02) : 212 - 218
  • [24] Energy-dependent Boundaries of Earth's Radiation Belt Electron Slot Region
    Mei, Yang
    Ge, Yasong
    Du, Aimin
    Gu, Xudong
    Summers, Danny
    Li, Xinlin
    Fu, Song
    Xiang, Zheng
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 922 (02):
  • [25] Operational Nowcasting of Electron Flux Levels in the Outer Zone of Earth's Radiation Belt
    Coleman, Tim
    McCollough, James P.
    Young, Shawn
    Rigler, E. Joshua
    SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2018, 16 (05): : 501 - 518
  • [26] Is the Solar Wind Electron Strahl a Seed Population for the Earth's Electron Radiation Belt?
    Borovsky, Joseph E.
    Runov, Andrei
    FRONTIERS IN ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2022, 9
  • [27] The 600 keV electron injections in the Earth's outer radiation belt: A statistical study
    Tang, ChaoLing
    Wang, Xu
    Ni, BinBin
    Su, ZhengPeng
    Zhang, JiChun
    EARTH AND PLANETARY PHYSICS, 2022, 6 (02) : 149 - 160
  • [28] The Effects of Geomagnetic Activities on Acceleration Regions of Radiation Belt Electrons
    Tang, Chao Ling
    Su, Zheng Peng
    Ni, Bin Bin
    Zhang, Ji Chun
    Chen, Jing Run
    Wang, Xu
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2023, 128 (06)
  • [29] Maximum Proton Trapping Energy in the Earth Radiation Belt
    Zharaspayev, T. R.
    Koldashov, S. V.
    Mikhailov, V. V.
    BULLETIN OF THE LEBEDEV PHYSICS INSTITUTE, 2019, 46 (11) : 348 - 350
  • [30] Maximum Proton Trapping Energy in the Earth Radiation Belt
    T. R. Zharaspayev
    S. V. Koldashov
    V. V. Mikhailov
    Bulletin of the Lebedev Physics Institute, 2019, 46 : 348 - 350