Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins

被引:1532
作者
Purvis, Ben [1 ]
Mao, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Robinson, Darren [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Lab Urban Complex & Sustainabil, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Phys & Astron, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, Sch Architecture, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Sustainable development; Conceptual review; Historical origins; Triple bottom line; History of sustainability; ENVIRONMENTAL MOVEMENT; DEVELOPING INDICATORS; BASIC NEEDS; ECOLOGY; SCIENCE; IDENTIFICATION; PERSPECTIVE; FRAMEWORK; EVOLUTION; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The three-pillar conception of (social, economic and environmental) sustainability, commonly represented by three intersecting circles with overall sustainability at the centre, has become ubiquitous. With a view of identifying the genesis and theoretical foundations of this conception, this paper reviews and discusses relevant historical sustainability literature. From this we find that there is no single point of origin of this three-pillar conception, but rather a gradual emergence from various critiques in the early academic literature of the economic status quo from both social and ecological perspectives on the one hand, and the quest to reconcile economic growth as a solution to social and ecological problems on the part of the United Nations on the other. The popular three circles diagram appears to have been first presented by Barbier (Environ Conserv 14:101, doi: 10.1017/s0376892900011449, 1987), albeit purposed towards developing nations with foci which differ from modern interpretations. The conceptualisation of three pillars seems to predate this, however. Nowhere have we found a theoretically rigorous description of the three pillars. This is thought to be in part due to the nature of the sustainability discourse arising from broadly different schools of thought historically. The absence of such a theoretically solid conception frustrates approaches towards a theoretically rigorous operationalisation of sustainability'.
引用
收藏
页码:681 / 695
页数:15
相关论文
共 131 条
[1]  
Altieri MA., 2018, AGROECOLOGY SCI SUST
[2]  
Altieri MA, 1987, AGROECOLOGY SCI BASI, V1
[3]  
[Anonymous], ECN17199820 UN
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Report of the Secretary-General: No Exit Without Strategy
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1989, ENVISIONING SUSTAINA
[6]  
[Anonymous], MANAGEMENT SUSTAINAB
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1987, REPORT WORLD COMMISS
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living, DOI DOI 10.1142/9789813147720_0019
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1976, REPORT DIRECTOR GEN
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1997, OV PROGR ACH UN C EN