Secondary interventions after elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair for degenerative aneurysms

Objective: We assessed the incidence and outcomes of graft-related secondary interventions (ie, open conversion or proximal or distal extensions) after elective thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aneurysmal disease. Methods: An institutional review of TEVAR for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAAs), between 2000 and 2011, was performed. Only elective TEVAR for DTAA using commercially available endografts was selected. Emergent cases, non-aneurysmal aortic pathology (ie, transection, pseudoaneurysm, dissection), and cases that used physician-modified devices were excluded. The incidence of unplanned graft-related secondary interventions was examined and outcomes were analyzed. Results: During the study period, 83 patients underwent elective TEVAR for DTAA that met the inclusion criteria. Subsequent graft-related secondary interventions were required in eight patients (10%). The mean interval to the secondary intervention was 31.8 months. Endoleak was the most common indication. Patients who required secondary interventions were significantly younger (mean age, 58 +/- 12 vs 69 +/- 11 years; P < .05). Operative mortality (<30 day) was zero, with one aneurysm-related late death occurring at 2 years after the secondary intervention. Factors that predisposed the need for secondary interventions were fusiform morphology of the aneurysm (P = .05) and extent of graft coverage in the proximal landing zone <3 cm (P < .05). Size of the aneurysm treated and the type of device used were not significant factors leading to secondary intervention. Conclusions: Intermediate and long-term results of elective TEVAR for DTAA demonstrate good durability, with acceptable rates of graft-related secondary interventions. Age, fusiform aneurysm morphology, and extent of proximal landing zones <3 cm were significant factors that led to subsequent secondary interventions. (J Vasc Surg 2013;57:1269-74.)