A prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy of topical anesthetics in nasal endoscopy

被引:13
作者
Gaviola, Gabriel C. [1 ]
Chen, Viola [1 ]
Chia, Stanley H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[2] MedStar Washington Hosp Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Washington, DC USA
[3] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Nasal; endoscopy; nasopharyngoscopy; pharyngoscopy; transnasal; laryngoscopy; topical; anesthetics; lidocaine; tetracaine; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CO-PHENYLCAINE; FLEXIBLE NASENDOSCOPY; RIGID NASENDOSCOPY; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; LIDOCAINE; COCAINE; NASOLARYNGOSCOPY; DISCOMFORT; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1002/lary.23966
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: Transnasal endoscopy is commonly performed in an outpatient otolaryngology setting. Patients are typically administered a topical anesthetic and decongestant prior to this procedure to alleviate discomfort and improve visualization. There is no consensus on which topical anesthetic is most effective in optimizing patient experience during the procedure. Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in the efficacy between atomized 2% tetracaine and 4% lidocaine as a topical anesthetic prior to transnasal endoscopy. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Methods: A total of 99 patients received oxymetazoline and were randomized to receive either 2% tetracaine or 4% lidocaine prior to transnasal endoscopy. Immediately following the procedure, participants completed a survey assessing level of discomfort and other adverse symptoms pertaining to the procedure using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). Results: There were no significant differences in VAS scores between the lidocaine and tetracaine groups. There were also no significant differences between genders in overall VAS scores and in the lidocaine and tetracaine subgroups. Older patients demonstrated significantly less discomfort or a sensation of bad taste overall. In contrast to patients receiving lidocaine, older patients receiving tetracaine experienced significantly less overall pain and discomfort, unpleasant taste, and dyspnea. Conclusion: In patients undergoing transnasal endoscopy, use of either 2% tetracaine or 4% lidocaine has similar effect. Tetracaine may be a better choice in older patients, however.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 858
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   EFFICACY OF DIAZEPAM AND MEPERIDINE IN AMBULATORY PEDIATRIC-PATIENTS UNDERGOING ENDOSCOPY - A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND TRIAL [J].
BAHALOMARA, N ;
NAHATA, MC ;
MURRAY, RD ;
LINSCHEID, TR ;
WILLIAMS, T ;
HEITLINGER, LA ;
LI, BUK ;
MCCLUNG, HJ ;
LININGER, B .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 1993, 16 (04) :387-392
[42]   Efficacy and Safety of Epidural Chloroprocaine for Breakthrough Pain During Labor Analgesia: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Trial [J].
Ji, Tianzhen ;
Jiang, Can ;
Liu, Hongxia ;
Cai, Zhehao ;
Liu, Rongrong ;
Xie, Lei ;
Xu, Cheng .
PAIN AND THERAPY, 2024, 13 (02) :227-239
[43]   The Effect of Buffered Lidocaine in Local Anesthesia: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study [J].
Lee, Hyuk Jin ;
Cho, Young Jae ;
Gong, Hyun Sik ;
Rhee, Seung Hwan ;
Park, Hyun Soo ;
Baek, Goo Hyun .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2013, 38A (05) :971-975
[44]   Patient Satisfaction With Propofol for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study [J].
Padmanabhan, Anantha ;
Frangopoulos, Christoforos ;
Shaffer, Lynn E. T. .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2017, 60 (10) :1102-1108
[45]   Efficacy of combination intravenous lidocaine and dexamethasone on propofol injection pain: A randomized, double-blind, prospective study in adult Korean surgical patients [J].
Kwak, Kyung-Hwa ;
Ha, Jaehyun ;
Kim, Youngsoo ;
Jeon, Younghoon .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 30 (06) :1113-1119
[46]   Efficacy of Articaine versus Lido,caine in Block and Infiltration Anesthesia Administered in Teeth with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study [J].
Ashraf, Hengameh ;
Kazem, Majeed ;
Dianat, Omid ;
Noghrehkar, Fatemeh .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2013, 39 (01) :6-10
[47]   Co-Phenylcaine Spray: can we improve the taste? A randomised, double-blind, crossover study [J].
Bailey, S. ;
Panizza, B. ;
Cabot, P. ;
Wallwork, B. .
JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2018, 132 (02) :138-142
[48]   Topical Diltiazem vs. topical Glyceril trinitrate in the treatment of chronic anal fissure : A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial [J].
Ala, Shahram ;
Saeedi, Majid ;
Hadianamrei, Roja ;
Ghorbanian, Ali .
ACTA GASTRO-ENTEROLOGICA BELGICA, 2012, 75 (04) :438-442
[49]   Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction [J].
Victoria Olmedo-Gaya, Maria ;
Javier Manzano-Moreno, Francisco ;
Luis Munoz-Lopez, Jose ;
Francisco Vallecillo-Capilla, Manuel ;
Reyes-Botella, Candela .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (09) :2981-2988
[50]   Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study of split-body comparison of topical hydroquinone and hexylresorcinol for skin pigment appearance [J].
Wu, Hera ;
Gabriel, Terence A. A. ;
Burney, Waqas A. A. ;
Chambers, Cindy J. J. ;
Pan, Adrianne ;
Sivamani, Raja K. K. .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 315 (05) :1207-1214