A prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy of topical anesthetics in nasal endoscopy

被引:13
作者
Gaviola, Gabriel C. [1 ]
Chen, Viola [1 ]
Chia, Stanley H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[2] MedStar Washington Hosp Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Washington, DC USA
[3] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Nasal; endoscopy; nasopharyngoscopy; pharyngoscopy; transnasal; laryngoscopy; topical; anesthetics; lidocaine; tetracaine; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CO-PHENYLCAINE; FLEXIBLE NASENDOSCOPY; RIGID NASENDOSCOPY; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; LIDOCAINE; COCAINE; NASOLARYNGOSCOPY; DISCOMFORT; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1002/lary.23966
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: Transnasal endoscopy is commonly performed in an outpatient otolaryngology setting. Patients are typically administered a topical anesthetic and decongestant prior to this procedure to alleviate discomfort and improve visualization. There is no consensus on which topical anesthetic is most effective in optimizing patient experience during the procedure. Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in the efficacy between atomized 2% tetracaine and 4% lidocaine as a topical anesthetic prior to transnasal endoscopy. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Methods: A total of 99 patients received oxymetazoline and were randomized to receive either 2% tetracaine or 4% lidocaine prior to transnasal endoscopy. Immediately following the procedure, participants completed a survey assessing level of discomfort and other adverse symptoms pertaining to the procedure using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). Results: There were no significant differences in VAS scores between the lidocaine and tetracaine groups. There were also no significant differences between genders in overall VAS scores and in the lidocaine and tetracaine subgroups. Older patients demonstrated significantly less discomfort or a sensation of bad taste overall. In contrast to patients receiving lidocaine, older patients receiving tetracaine experienced significantly less overall pain and discomfort, unpleasant taste, and dyspnea. Conclusion: In patients undergoing transnasal endoscopy, use of either 2% tetracaine or 4% lidocaine has similar effect. Tetracaine may be a better choice in older patients, however.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 858
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for inferior alveolar nerve blocks [J].
Fernandez, C ;
Reader, A ;
Beck, M ;
Nusstein, J .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2005, 31 (07) :499-503
[32]   Efficacy of bupivacaine injection after pulsed radiofrequency ablation in the management of trigeminal facial pain A prospective, randomized, and double-blind study [J].
Hilal, Faisal M. ;
Alyamani, Omar A. ;
Kaki, Abdullah M. .
SAUDI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (06) :551-558
[33]   A prospective, randomized, double-blind study to compare the efficacy of lidocaine + metoclopramide and lidocaine + ketamine combinations in preventing pain on propofol injection [J].
Kapil Chaudhary ;
Pramod Gupta ;
Anoop Raj Gogia .
Journal of Anesthesia, 2013, 27 :402-406
[34]   Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine as a Supplemental Buccal Infiltration in Mandibular Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study [J].
Rogers, Brandon S. ;
Botero, Tatiana M. ;
McDonald, Neville J. ;
Gardner, Richard J. ;
Peters, Mathilde C. .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2014, 40 (06) :753-758
[35]   Topical anaesthetic use for treating premature ejaculation: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study [J].
Busato, W ;
Galindo, CC .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 93 (07) :1018-1021
[36]   The efficacy of 2% Lidocaine gel in pain relieving of episiotomy: A double-blind randomized trial [J].
Masoumeh, Abedzadeh Kalahroudi ;
Zohreh, Sadat ;
Farzaneh, Saberi .
PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 27 (02) :375-378
[37]   A Prospective, Randomized Double-Blinded Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Buffered Local Anesthetics in Infected and Inflamed Pulp and Periapical Tissues [J].
Senthoor, Pandian ;
Janani, Krishnamachari ;
Ravindran, C. .
JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2020, 19 (02) :246-250
[38]   A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of bupivacaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations [J].
Gross, Renie ;
McCartney, Melissa ;
Reader, Al ;
Beck, Mike .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2007, 33 (09) :1021-1024
[39]   A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations [J].
Evans, Grace ;
Nusstein, John ;
Drum, Melissa ;
Reader, Al ;
Beck, Mike .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2008, 34 (04) :389-393
[40]   Comparison of Topical Lidocaine Spray With Placebo for Pain Relief in Colposcopic Procedures: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study [J].
Oz, Murat ;
Korkmaz, Elmas ;
Cetinkaya, Nilufer ;
Bas, Sevda ;
Ozdal, Bulent ;
Meydanli, Mehmet Mutlu ;
Gungor, Tayfun .
JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2015, 19 (03) :212-214