A prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy of topical anesthetics in nasal endoscopy

被引:12
作者
Gaviola, Gabriel C. [1 ]
Chen, Viola [1 ]
Chia, Stanley H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[2] MedStar Washington Hosp Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Washington, DC USA
[3] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Nasal; endoscopy; nasopharyngoscopy; pharyngoscopy; transnasal; laryngoscopy; topical; anesthetics; lidocaine; tetracaine; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CO-PHENYLCAINE; FLEXIBLE NASENDOSCOPY; RIGID NASENDOSCOPY; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; LIDOCAINE; COCAINE; NASOLARYNGOSCOPY; DISCOMFORT; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1002/lary.23966
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: Transnasal endoscopy is commonly performed in an outpatient otolaryngology setting. Patients are typically administered a topical anesthetic and decongestant prior to this procedure to alleviate discomfort and improve visualization. There is no consensus on which topical anesthetic is most effective in optimizing patient experience during the procedure. Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in the efficacy between atomized 2% tetracaine and 4% lidocaine as a topical anesthetic prior to transnasal endoscopy. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Methods: A total of 99 patients received oxymetazoline and were randomized to receive either 2% tetracaine or 4% lidocaine prior to transnasal endoscopy. Immediately following the procedure, participants completed a survey assessing level of discomfort and other adverse symptoms pertaining to the procedure using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). Results: There were no significant differences in VAS scores between the lidocaine and tetracaine groups. There were also no significant differences between genders in overall VAS scores and in the lidocaine and tetracaine subgroups. Older patients demonstrated significantly less discomfort or a sensation of bad taste overall. In contrast to patients receiving lidocaine, older patients receiving tetracaine experienced significantly less overall pain and discomfort, unpleasant taste, and dyspnea. Conclusion: In patients undergoing transnasal endoscopy, use of either 2% tetracaine or 4% lidocaine has similar effect. Tetracaine may be a better choice in older patients, however.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 858
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Oral vs Intravenous vs Topical Tranexamic Acid in Primary Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Study [J].
Luo, Ze-Yu ;
Wang, Hao-Yang ;
Wang, Duan ;
Zhou, Kai ;
Pei, Fu-Xing ;
Zhou, Zong-Ke .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (03) :786-793
[22]   Efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation during gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized, double-blind, controlled, prospective study [J].
Kim, Su Young ;
Chung, Jun-Won ;
Park, Dong Kyun ;
Kwon, Kwang An ;
Kim, Kyoung Oh ;
Kim, Yoon Jae .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 82 (06) :1018-1024
[23]   Patient tolerance during outpatient flexible cystoscopy -: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing plain lubrication and lidocaine gel [J].
Rodríguez-Rubio, F ;
Sanz, G ;
Garrido, S ;
Sánchez, C ;
Estudillo, F .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2004, 38 (06) :477-480
[24]   Effect of topical ropivacaine on the response to endotracheal tube during emergence from general anesthesia: a prospective randomized double-blind controlled study [J].
Fang, Panpan ;
Zong, Zhijun ;
Lu, Yao ;
Han, Xiaoyu ;
Liu, Xuesheng .
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2018, 18
[25]   Topical nasal xylometazoline for flexible bronchoscopy (VAIN): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Sryma, P. B. ;
Mittal, Saurabh ;
Tiwari, Pawan ;
Mohan, Anant ;
Hadda, Vijay ;
Guleria, Randeep ;
Madan, Karan .
RESPIRATORY INVESTIGATION, 2021, 59 (03) :350-355
[26]   Sulforaphane Treatment in Children with Autism: A Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Study [J].
Magner, Martin ;
Thorova, Katerina ;
Zupova, Veronika ;
Houska, Milan ;
Svandova, Ivana ;
Novotna, Pavla ;
Triska, Jan ;
Vrchotova, Nadezda ;
Soural, Ivo ;
Jilek, Ladislav .
NUTRIENTS, 2023, 15 (03)
[27]   Clinical Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Thyroidectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial [J].
Geun Joo Choi ;
Hyun Kang ;
Eun Jin Ahn ;
Jong In Oh ;
Chong Wha Baek ;
Yong Hun Jung ;
Jin Yun Kim .
World Journal of Surgery, 2016, 40 :2941-2947
[28]   Comparison of the Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Mepivacaine in Pediatric Patients: A Randomized, Double-blind Study [J].
Odabas, Mesut Enes ;
Cinar, Cagdas ;
Deveci, Ceren ;
Alacam, Alev .
PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2012, 34 (01) :42-45
[29]   Effect of topical nasal anesthetic on swallowing in healthy adults: A double-blind, high-resolution manometry study [J].
Hernandez, Esther Guiu ;
Gozdzikowska, Kristin ;
Apperley, Olivia ;
Huckabee, Maggie-Lee .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2018, 128 (06) :1335-1339
[30]   Articaine and lidocaine mandibular buccal infiltration anesthesia: A prospective randomized double-blind cross-over study [J].
Kanaa, MD ;
Whitworth, JM ;
Corbett, IP ;
Meechan, JG .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2006, 32 (04) :296-298