A prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing the efficacy of topical anesthetics in nasal endoscopy

被引:12
|
作者
Gaviola, Gabriel C. [1 ]
Chen, Viola [1 ]
Chia, Stanley H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Washington, DC USA
[2] MedStar Washington Hosp Ctr, Dept Otolaryngol, Washington, DC USA
[3] MedStar Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Washington, DC USA
来源
LARYNGOSCOPE | 2013年 / 123卷 / 04期
关键词
Nasal; endoscopy; nasopharyngoscopy; pharyngoscopy; transnasal; laryngoscopy; topical; anesthetics; lidocaine; tetracaine; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; CO-PHENYLCAINE; FLEXIBLE NASENDOSCOPY; RIGID NASENDOSCOPY; LOCAL-ANESTHESIA; LIDOCAINE; COCAINE; NASOLARYNGOSCOPY; DISCOMFORT; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.1002/lary.23966
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Introduction: Transnasal endoscopy is commonly performed in an outpatient otolaryngology setting. Patients are typically administered a topical anesthetic and decongestant prior to this procedure to alleviate discomfort and improve visualization. There is no consensus on which topical anesthetic is most effective in optimizing patient experience during the procedure. Objective: To determine whether there is a difference in the efficacy between atomized 2% tetracaine and 4% lidocaine as a topical anesthetic prior to transnasal endoscopy. Study Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Methods: A total of 99 patients received oxymetazoline and were randomized to receive either 2% tetracaine or 4% lidocaine prior to transnasal endoscopy. Immediately following the procedure, participants completed a survey assessing level of discomfort and other adverse symptoms pertaining to the procedure using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS). Results: There were no significant differences in VAS scores between the lidocaine and tetracaine groups. There were also no significant differences between genders in overall VAS scores and in the lidocaine and tetracaine subgroups. Older patients demonstrated significantly less discomfort or a sensation of bad taste overall. In contrast to patients receiving lidocaine, older patients receiving tetracaine experienced significantly less overall pain and discomfort, unpleasant taste, and dyspnea. Conclusion: In patients undergoing transnasal endoscopy, use of either 2% tetracaine or 4% lidocaine has similar effect. Tetracaine may be a better choice in older patients, however.
引用
收藏
页码:852 / 858
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study on the Efficacy of Different Modes of Topical Application of Nasal Anesthetics in the Diagnostic Nasal Endoscopy Procedure
    Velayutham, Prabu
    Davis, Prem
    Ravichandran, Surya
    John, Joemol
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [2] Premedication Methods in Nasal Endoscopy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study
    Sahin, Mehmet Ilhan
    Kokoglu, Kerem
    Gulec, Safak
    Ketencil, Ibrahim
    Unlu, Yasar
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2017, 10 (02) : 158 - 163
  • [3] A randomized, prospective, double-blind study on the efficacy of dead sea salt nasal irrigations
    Friedman, Michael
    Vidyasagar, Ramakrishnan
    Joseph, Ninos
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2006, 116 (06): : 878 - 882
  • [4] DOUBLE-BLIND CROSSOVER COMPARISON OF TOPICAL ANESTHETICS
    GILL, CJ
    ORR, DL
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 1979, 98 (02): : 213 - 214
  • [5] Topical nasal anesthesia and laryngopharyngeal sensory testing: A prospective, double-blind crossover study
    Johnson, PE
    Belafsky, PC
    Postma, GN
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2003, 112 (01): : 14 - 16
  • [6] A prospective, double-blind, randomized study on the use of a topical anesthetic, vasoconstrictor and placebo during transnasal flexible fiberoptic endoscopy
    Leder, SB
    Ross, DA
    Briskin, KB
    Sasaki, CT
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1997, 40 (06): : 1352 - 1357
  • [7] Comparing the Efficacy of Topical Metformin and Placebo in the Treatment of Melasma: A Randomized, Double-blind, Clinical Trial
    Mapar, Mohammad Ali
    Hemmati, Ali Asghar
    Namdari, Ghazal
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 30 (04)
  • [8] Effectiveness of various formulations of local anesthetics and additives for topical anesthesia - a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
    Weilbach, Christian
    Hoppe, Christian
    Karst, Matthias
    Winterhalter, Michael
    Raymondos, Konstantinos
    Schultz, Arthur
    Rahe-Meyer, Niels
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2017, 10 : 1105 - 1109
  • [9] Stopping smoking -: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing nortriptyline to placebo
    da Costa, CL
    Younes, RN
    Lourenço, MTC
    CHEST, 2002, 122 (02) : 403 - 408
  • [10] TOPICAL PHARYNGAL ANESTHESIA FOR EASING ENDOSCOPY - A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY
    LACHTER, J
    JACOBS, R
    LAVY, A
    WEISLER, A
    SUISSA, A
    ENAT, R
    EIDELMAN, S
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1990, 36 (01) : 19 - 21