Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for the treatment of oropharyngeal carcinoma: The Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center experience

被引:218
作者
de Arruda, FF
Puri, DR
Zhung, J
Narayana, A
Wolden, S
Hunt, M
Stambuk, H
Pfister, D
Kraus, D
Shaha, A
Shah, J
Lee, NY
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10022 USA
[2] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Phys, New York, NY 10022 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, New York, NY 10022 USA
[4] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, New York, NY 10022 USA
[5] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Head & Neck Surg, New York, NY 10022 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2006年 / 64卷 / 02期
关键词
oropharynx; cancer; intensity-modulated radiotherapy; radiation;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.03.006
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To review the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center's experience in using intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer. Methods and Materials: Between September 1998 and June 2004, 50 patients with histologically confirmed cancer of the oropharynx underwent IMRT at our institution. There were 40 men and 10 women with a median age of 56 years (range, 28-78 years). The disease was Stage I in 1 patient (2%), Stage 11 in 3 patients (6%), Stage III in 7 (14%), and Stage IV in 39 (78%). Forty-eight patients (96%) received definitive treatment, and 2 (4%) were treated in the postoperative adjuvant setting. Concurrent chemotherapy was used in 43 patients (86%). Patients were treated using three different IMRT approaches: 76% dose painting, 18% concomitant boost with IMRT in both am and pm deliveries, and 6% concomitant boost with IMRT only in pm delivery. Regardless of the approach, the average prescription dose to the gross tumor planning target volume was 70 Gy, while the average dose delivered to the subclinical volume was 59.4 Gy in the dose painting group and 54 Gy in the concomitant boost group. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding tubes (PEGs) were placed before the beginning of treatment in 84% of the patients. Acute and late toxicity were graded according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Toxicity was also evaluated using subjective criteria such as the presence of esophageal stricture, and the need for PEG usage. The local progression-free, regional progression-free, and distant metastases-free rates, and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Three patients had persistent locoregional disease after treatment. The 2-year estimates of local progression-free, regional progression-free, distant metastases-free, and overall survival were 98%, 88%, 84%, and 98%, respectively. The worst acute mucositis experienced was Grade 1 in 4 patients (8%), Grade 2 in 27 (54%), and Grade 3 in 19 (38%). Xerostomia decreased with increasing time interval from the end of radiotherapy, and among the patients with at least 9 months of follow-up there was 67% Grade 0-1 and 33% Grade 2 toxicity. Of the 42 patients who required upfront PEG placement, 6 were still using PEG for nutrition at the time of this analysis. Three patients had cervical esophageal strictures, and of these, I was still PEG dependent I year after treatment. Two of these patients were treated with the IMRT concomitant boost am and pm approach, whereas the other was treated with the dose painting technique. Conclusions: Intensity-modulated radiotherapy achieved encouraging local control rates in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. Treatment toxicity was acceptable even in the setting of concurrent chemotherapy. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm these preliminary findings. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 373
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Intergroup phase III comparison of standard radiation therapy and two schedules of concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable squamous cell head and neck cancer [J].
Adelstein, DJ ;
Li, Y ;
Adams, GL ;
Wagner, H ;
Kish, JA ;
Ensley, JF ;
Schuller, DE ;
Forastiere, AA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (01) :92-98
[2]  
Alvarez E, 2003, CLIN CANCER RES, V9, P3454
[3]   Prophylactic use of amifostine to prevent radiochemotherapy-induced mucositis and xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer [J].
Antonadou, D ;
Pepelassi, M ;
Synodinou, M ;
Puglisi, M ;
Throuvalas, N .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 52 (03) :739-747
[4]   Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for long-term feeding of patients with oropharyngeal tumors [J].
Anwander, T ;
Bergé, S ;
Appel, T ;
von Lindern, JJ ;
Martini, M ;
Mommsen, J ;
Kipnowski, J ;
Niederhagen, B .
NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2004, 50 (01) :40-45
[5]   A randomized study of very accelerated radiotherapy with and without amifostine in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [J].
Bourhis, J ;
De Crevoisier, R ;
Abdulkarim, B ;
Deutsch, E ;
Lusinchi, A ;
Luboinski, B ;
Wibault, P ;
Eschwege, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2000, 46 (05) :1105-1108
[6]   Phase III randomized trial of amifostine as a radioprotector in head and neck cancer [J].
Brizel, DM ;
Wasserman, TH ;
Henke, M ;
Strnad, V ;
Rudat, V ;
Monnier, A ;
Eschwege, F ;
Zhang, J ;
Russell, L ;
Oster, W ;
Sauer, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (19) :3339-3345
[7]   Randomized trial of radiation therapy versus concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for advanced-stage oropharynx carcinoma [J].
Calais, G ;
Alfonsi, M ;
Bardet, E ;
Sire, C ;
Germain, T ;
Bergerot, P ;
Rhein, B ;
Tortochaux, J ;
Oudinot, P ;
Bertrand, P .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (24) :2081-2086
[8]   Intensity-modulated radiation therapy reduces late salivary toxicity without compromising tumor control in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma: a comparisons with conventional techniques [J].
Chao, KSC ;
Majhail, N ;
Huang, CJ ;
Simpson, JR ;
Perez, CA ;
Haughey, B ;
Spector, G .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2001, 61 (03) :275-280
[9]   Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma: Impact of tumor volume [J].
Chao, KSC ;
Ozyigit, G ;
Blanco, AI ;
Thorstad, WL ;
Deasy, JO ;
Haughey, BH ;
Spector, GJ ;
Sessions, DG .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 59 (01) :43-50
[10]   Toxicity profile of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck carcinoma and potential role of amifostine [J].
Chao, KSC ;
Ozyigit, G ;
Thorsdad, WL .
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2003, 30 (06) :101-108