Holistic analysis of urban water systems in the Greater Cincinnati region: (2) resource use profiles by emergy accounting approach

被引:24
作者
Arden, Sam [1 ]
Ma, Xin [2 ]
Brown, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, UF Ctr Environm Policy, Phelps Lab 102, POB 116530, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] US EPA ORD, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, 26 West Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
关键词
Emergy; Integrated urban water management; Sustainability; System analysis; Resource efficiency; COMMUNITY WATER; SUSTAINABILITY; ENERGY; METRICS; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; SERVICES; DESIGN; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.wroa.2018.100012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With increasing populations, mounting environmental pressures and aging infrastructure, urban water and wastewater utilities have to make investment decisions limited by both economic and environmental constraints. The challenges facing urban water systems can no longer be sustainably solved by traditional siloed water management approaches. A central premise of contemporary urban water management paradigms is that in order for urban water systems to be more sustainable and economical, an improvement in resource use efficiency at system level must be achieved. This study provides a quantification of the total resource use of a typical urban water system exemplified in Greater Cincinnati region from raw water extraction for drinking water to wastewater treatment and discharge, providing a better understanding of resource expenditure distributions within the system and a necessary bench-mark to which future system improvements can be compared. The emergy methodology was used so that the total environmental work required to produce disparate system inputs could be expressed using a common unit. The results were compared to the concurring life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) results of the same system. Emergy results highlight drinking water treatment and drinking water distribution as two resource-intensive stages, with energy for pumping and chemicals for conditioning representing the greatest inputs to the former and energy for pumping and metals for piping representing the greatest inputs to the latter. For wastewater collection and treatment stages, aeration and sludge handling were identified as the highest emergy unit processes, mostly due to energy use. Comparison with LCA results substantiate the environmental concerns associated with energy use in the drinking water treatment and distribution stages but indicate that environmental burdens associated with infrastructure are more dependent upon upstream resource use rather than downstream environmental impact. Results from emergy, LCA and LCC point towards aeration and sludge handling as two unit processes on the wastewater side that are particularly costly and environmentally impactful. Results in total are used to suggest alternative strategies that can alleviate identified environmental burdens and economic costs. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[11]   Emergy based analysis of Italian electricity production system [J].
Caruso, C ;
Catenacci, G ;
Marchettini, N ;
Principi, I ;
Tiezzi, E .
JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2001, 66 (01) :265-272
[12]   The relationship between ecosystem services and purchased input in Swedish wastewater treatment systems -: a case study [J].
Geber, U ;
Björklund, J .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 18 (01) :39-59
[13]  
Grigg N.S., 2013, Dual Water Systems: Characterization and Performance for Distribution of Reclaimed Water
[14]   A Changing Framework for Urban Water Systems [J].
Hering, Janet G. ;
Waite, T. David ;
Luthy, Richard G. ;
Drewes, Joerg E. ;
Sedlak, David L. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (19) :10721-10726
[15]   Measuring Environmental Sustainability of Water in Watersheds [J].
Hester, Erich T. ;
Little, John C. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 47 (15) :8083-8090
[16]   Development of a multidisciplinary approach to assess regional sustainability [J].
Hopton, Matthew E. ;
Cabezas, Heriberto ;
Campbell, Daniel ;
Eason, Tarsha ;
Garmestani, Ahjond S. ;
Heberling, Matthew T. ;
Karunanithi, Arunprakash T. ;
Templeton, Joshua J. ;
White, Denis ;
Zanowick, Marie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2010, 17 (01) :48-56
[17]   Integrated Metrics for Improving the Life Cycle Approach to Assessing Product System Sustainability [J].
Ingwersen, Wesley ;
Cabezas, Heriberto ;
Weisbrod, Anne V. ;
Eason, Tarsha ;
Demeke, Bayou ;
Ma, Xin ;
Hawkins, Troy R. ;
Lee, Seung-Jin ;
Bare, Jane C. ;
Ceja, Manuel .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (03) :1386-1413
[18]   Emergy as a Life Cycle Impact Assessment Indicator A Gold Mining Case Study [J].
Ingwersen, Wesley W. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 15 (04) :550-567
[19]   The changing metabolism of cities [J].
Kennedy, Christopher ;
Cuddihy, John ;
Engel-Yan, Joshua .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2007, 11 (02) :43-59
[20]   The concept of sustainable urban water management [J].
Larsen, TA ;
Gujer, W .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 35 (09) :3-10