Holistic analysis of urban water systems in the Greater Cincinnati region: (2) resource use profiles by emergy accounting approach

被引:24
作者
Arden, Sam [1 ]
Ma, Xin [2 ]
Brown, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, UF Ctr Environm Policy, Phelps Lab 102, POB 116530, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] US EPA ORD, Natl Risk Management Res Lab, 26 West Martin Luther King Dr, Cincinnati, OH 45268 USA
关键词
Emergy; Integrated urban water management; Sustainability; System analysis; Resource efficiency; COMMUNITY WATER; SUSTAINABILITY; ENERGY; METRICS; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK; SERVICES; DESIGN; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.wroa.2018.100012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With increasing populations, mounting environmental pressures and aging infrastructure, urban water and wastewater utilities have to make investment decisions limited by both economic and environmental constraints. The challenges facing urban water systems can no longer be sustainably solved by traditional siloed water management approaches. A central premise of contemporary urban water management paradigms is that in order for urban water systems to be more sustainable and economical, an improvement in resource use efficiency at system level must be achieved. This study provides a quantification of the total resource use of a typical urban water system exemplified in Greater Cincinnati region from raw water extraction for drinking water to wastewater treatment and discharge, providing a better understanding of resource expenditure distributions within the system and a necessary bench-mark to which future system improvements can be compared. The emergy methodology was used so that the total environmental work required to produce disparate system inputs could be expressed using a common unit. The results were compared to the concurring life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) results of the same system. Emergy results highlight drinking water treatment and drinking water distribution as two resource-intensive stages, with energy for pumping and chemicals for conditioning representing the greatest inputs to the former and energy for pumping and metals for piping representing the greatest inputs to the latter. For wastewater collection and treatment stages, aeration and sludge handling were identified as the highest emergy unit processes, mostly due to energy use. Comparison with LCA results substantiate the environmental concerns associated with energy use in the drinking water treatment and distribution stages but indicate that environmental burdens associated with infrastructure are more dependent upon upstream resource use rather than downstream environmental impact. Results from emergy, LCA and LCC point towards aeration and sludge handling as two unit processes on the wastewater side that are particularly costly and environmentally impactful. Results in total are used to suggest alternative strategies that can alleviate identified environmental burdens and economic costs. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Emergy evaluation of water treatment processes [J].
Arbault, Damien ;
Rugani, Benedetto ;
Tiruta-Barna, Ligia ;
Benetto, Enrico .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 60 :172-182
[2]   Feasibility of using constructed treatment wetlands for municipal wastewater treatment in the Bogota Savannah, Colombia [J].
Arias, Mauricio E. ;
Brown, Mark T. .
ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 35 (07) :1070-1078
[3]   A thermodynamic framework for ecologically conscious process systems engineering [J].
Bakshi, BR .
COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 24 (2-7) :1767-1773
[4]   Thermodynamic Metrics for Aggregation of Natural Resources in Life Cycle Analysis: Insight via Application to Some Transportation Fuels [J].
Baral, Anil ;
Bakshi, Bhavik R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (02) :800-807
[5]  
Behrend G., 2007, 4 BIENN EM C C CTR E
[6]   The geobiosphere emergy baseline: A synthesis [J].
Brown, Mark T. ;
Campbell, Daniel E. ;
De Vilbiss, Christopher ;
Ulgiati, Sergio .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2016, 339 :92-95
[7]   Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems [J].
Brown, MT ;
Ulgiati, S .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2002, 10 (04) :321-334
[8]   Embodied energy analysis and EMERGY analysis: A comparative view [J].
Brown, MT ;
Herendeen, RA .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 19 (03) :219-235
[9]  
Buenfil A.A., 2001, Emergy Evaluation of Water
[10]   Utilising integrated urban water management to assess the viability of decentralised water solutions [J].
Burn, Stewart ;
Maheepala, Shiroma ;
Sharma, Ashok .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 66 (01) :113-121