The Local Median Filtering Method for Correcting the Laser Return Intensity Information from Discrete Airborne Laser Scanning Data

被引:1
作者
Wu, Bingxiao [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Guang [1 ,2 ]
Ju, Weimin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Int Inst Earth Syst Sci, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
[2] Jiangsu Prov Key Lab Geog Informat Sci, Nanjing 210023, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
intensity correction; laser radiation effect; airborne laser scanning; radar equation; RADIOMETRIC CALIBRATION; FLYING ALTITUDE; LIDAR; CLASSIFICATION; ACCURACY; DESIGN; NORMALIZATION; MODEL; ANGLE;
D O I
10.3390/rs12101681
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Laser return intensity (LRI) information obtained from airborne laser scanning (ALS) data has been used to classify land cover types and to reveal canopy physiological features. However, the sensor-related and environmental parameters may introduce noise. In this study, we developed a local median filtering (LMF) method to point-by-point correct the LRI information. For each point, we deduced the reference variation range for its LRI. Then, we replaced the outliers of LRI with their local median values. To evaluate the LMF method, we assessed the discrepancy of LRI information from the same and diverse land cover types. Moreover, we used the corrected LRI to distinguish points from grass, road, and bare land, which were classified as ground type in ALS data. The results show that using the LMF method could increase the similarity of pointwise LRI from the same land cover type and the discrepancy of those from different kinds of targets. Using the LMF-corrected LRI could improve the overall classification accuracy of three land cover types by about 3% (all over 81%, kappa >= 0.73, p < 0.05), compared to those using the original and range-normalized LRI. The sensor-related metrics brought more noise to the original LRI information than the environmental factors. Using the LMF method could effectively correct LRI information from historical ALS datasets.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, INT ARCH PHOTOGRAMM
  • [2] [Anonymous], P SPIE LASER RADAR T
  • [3] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [4] Hyperspectral and Lidar Intensity Data Fusion: A Framework for the Rigorous Correction of Illumination, Anisotropic Effects, and Cross Calibration
    Brell, Maximilian
    Segl, Karl
    Guanter, Luis
    Bookhagen, Bodo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 55 (05): : 2799 - 2810
  • [5] Mapping of land cover in northern California with simulated hyperspectral satellite imagery
    Clark, Matthew L.
    Kilham, Nina E.
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2016, 119 : 228 - 245
  • [6] Radiometric correction in laser scanning
    Coren, Franco
    Sterzai, Paolo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2006, 27 (15) : 3097 - 3104
  • [7] Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms
    Dietterich, TG
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTATION, 1998, 10 (07) : 1895 - 1923
  • [8] Combination of overlap-driven adjustment and Phong model for LiDAR intensity correction
    Ding, Qiong
    Chen, Wu
    King, Bruce
    Liu, Yanxiong
    Liu, Guoxiang
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 75 : 40 - 47
  • [9] Beyond 3-D: The new spectrum of lidar applications for earth and ecological sciences
    Eitel, Jan U. H.
    Hoefle, Bernhard
    Vierling, Lee A.
    Abellan, Antonio
    Asner, Gregory P.
    Deems, Jeffrey S.
    Glennie, Craig L.
    Joerg, Philip C.
    LeWinter, Adam L.
    Magney, Troy S.
    Mandlburger, Gottfried
    Morton, Douglas C.
    Mueller, Joerg
    Vierling, Kerri T.
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 186 : 372 - 392
  • [10] Estimating biomass carbon stocks for a Mediterranean forest in central Spain using LiDAR height and intensity data
    Garcia, Mariano
    Riano, David
    Chuvieco, Emilio
    Danson, F. Mark
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 114 (04) : 816 - 830