Split-Dose Preparations Are Superior to Day-Before Bowel Cleansing Regimens: A Meta-analysis

被引:161
作者
Martel, Myriam [1 ,3 ]
Barkun, Alan N. [1 ,2 ]
Menard, Charles [4 ]
Restellini, Sophie [5 ]
Kherad, Omar [6 ]
Vanasse, Alain [3 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Div Gastroenterol, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Ctr Hlth, Epidemiol & Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
[3] Univ Sherbrooke, Dept Med Famille & Med Urgence, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[4] Univ Sherbrooke, Med, Sherbrooke, PQ J1K 2R1, Canada
[5] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Specialties Internal Med, Geneva, Switzerland
[6] Univ Geneva, La Tour Hosp, Internal Med, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
Meta-analyses; Bowel Preparation; Split-Dose; Bowel Cleansings; ORAL SODIUM-PHOSPHATE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GLYCOL-ELECTROLYTE-SOLUTION; SOLUTION PLUS BISACODYL; SINGLE-BLIND TRIAL; POLYETHYLENE-GLYCOL; COLONOSCOPY PREPARATION; MAGNESIUM CITRATE; CLINICAL-TRIALS; LAVAGE SOLUTION;
D O I
10.1053/j.gastro.2015.04.004
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND & AIMS: There are different regimens of preparing the colon for colonoscopy, including polyethylene glycol (PEG), sodium phosphate, picosulfate, or oral sulfate solutions. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of split-dose vs other colon preparation regimens, the optimal products for use, and the most effective preparation volumes. METHODS: We performed systematic searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CENTRAL, and ISI Web of knowledge databases, from January 1980 to March 2014, for published results from randomized trials that assessed split-dose regimens vs day-before colonoscopy preparation. We excluded studies that included pediatric or hospitalized patients, or patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The primary outcome was efficacy of bowel cleansing. Secondary outcomes included side effects or complications, outcomes of procedures, patients' willingness to repeat the procedure, and the amount of time required for patients to resume daily activities. RESULTS: We identified 47 trials that fulfilled our inclusion criteria (n = 13,487 patients). Split-dose preparations provided significantly better colon cleansing than day-before preparations (odds ratio [OR], 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.86-3.39), as well as day-before preparations with PEG (OR, 2.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.46-4.63), sodium phosphate (OR, 9.34; 95% confidence interval, 2.12-41.11), or picosulfate (OR, 3.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.95-6.45). PEG split-dose preparations of 3 L or more yielded greater bowel cleanliness than lower-volume split-dose regimens (OR, 1.89; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-3.46), but only in intention-to-treat analysis. A higher proportion of patients were willing to repeat split-dose vs day-before cleansing (OR, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-3.46), and low-volume split-dose preparations vs high-volume split-dose preparation (OR, 4.95; 95% confidence interval, 2.21-11.10). There were no differences between preparations in other secondary outcome measures. However, there was variation among studies in definitions and main and secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Based on meta-analysis, split-dose regimens increase the quality of colon cleansing and are preferred by patients compared with day-before preparations. Additional research is required to evaluate oral sulfate solution-based and PEG low-volume regimens further.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 88
页数:10
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the adjunct use of tegaserod in whole-dose or split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation [J].
Abdul-Baki, Heitham ;
Hashash, Jana G. ;
ElHajj, Ihab I. ;
Azar, Cecilio ;
El Zahabi, Lara ;
Mourad, Fadi H. ;
Barada, Kassem A. ;
Sharara, Ala I. .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 68 (02) :294-300
[2]  
Altman DG., 1996, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, V7th
[3]   A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation [J].
Aoun, E ;
Abdul-Baki, H ;
Azar, C ;
Mourad, F ;
Barada, K ;
Berro, Z ;
Tarchichi, M ;
Sharara, AI .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 62 (02) :213-218
[4]   Prospective randomized trial comparing bowel cleaning preparations for colonoscopy [J].
Arezzo, A .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2000, 10 (04) :215-217
[5]  
Aronchick C., 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P2667
[6]   Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: Efficacy, tolerability and safety - A Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper [J].
Barkun, Alan ;
Chiba, Naoki ;
Enns, Robert ;
Marcon, Margaret ;
Natsheh, Susan ;
PharmD, Co Pham ;
Sadowski, Dan ;
Vanner, Stephen .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 20 (11) :699-710
[7]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[8]   Meta-analysis: the relative efficacy of oral bowel preparations for colonoscopy 1985-2010 [J].
Belsey, J. ;
Crosta, C. ;
Epstein, O. ;
Fischbach, W. ;
Layer, P. ;
Parente, F. ;
Halphen, M. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 35 (02) :222-237
[9]   2 L versus 4 L of PEG3350+electrolytes for outpatient colonic preparation: a randomized, controlled trial [J].
Brahmania, Mayur ;
Ou, George ;
Bressler, Brian ;
Ko, Hin Kin ;
Lam, Eric ;
Telford, Jennifer ;
Enns, Robert .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 79 (03) :408-U221
[10]   Optimal bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: split the dose! A series of meta-analyses of controlled studies [J].
Bucci, Cristina ;
Rotondano, Gianluca ;
Hassan, Cesare ;
Rea, Matilde ;
Bianco, Maria Antonia ;
Cipolletta, Livio ;
Ciacci, Carolina ;
Marmo, Riccardo .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 80 (04) :566-+