Collaborative housing and housing providers: towards an analytical framework of multi-stakeholder collaboration in housing co-production

被引:85
作者
Czischke, Darinka [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Architecture & Built Environm, Dept Management Built Environm MBE, Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Collaborative housing; co-production; self-organisation; stakeholder analysis; housing providers; PUBLIC-SERVICES; CO-PRODUCERS; MANAGEMENT; COMMUNITY; POLITICS; FRANCE;
D O I
10.1080/19491247.2017.1331593
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Many European countries are experiencing a recent (re) emergence of collaborative housing, such as co-housing, housing co-operatives and other forms of collective self-organised housing. One of the less studied aspects of these housing forms is the relationship between users (i.e. residents) and institutional actors and, in particular, established housing providers. This paper proposes a conceptual framework that helps expand the knowledge on the nature of these collaboration practices. To this end, different concepts and theories are reviewed, with a focus on collaboration and co-production as useful constructs to understand these phenomena. The proposed framework is applied to two examples of collaboration for housing co-production between residents' groups and established housing providers in Vienna and Lyon, respectively. We found a high degree of user involvement throughout each project. In both cases, the group of residents that initiated the project partnered-up with established housing providers, who facilitated access to key resources and professional expertise. We hypothesise that housing providers with an ethos akin to initiators' values will more likely become (and stay) involved in collaborative housing, as compared to mainstream providers. We conclude with a reflection on possible improvements to our analytical framework and directions for further research.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 81
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Agranoff R., 2004, Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments
[2]   Understanding project sociology by modeling stakeholders [J].
Alexander, I ;
Robertson, S .
IEEE SOFTWARE, 2004, 21 (01) :23-27
[3]   A public management road less travelled: Clients as co-producers of public services [J].
Alford, J .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 1998, 57 (04) :128-137
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, COPRODUCTION 3 SECTO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2012, HOUS SOC SER
[6]  
Biau V., 2010, HABITATS ALTERNATIFS
[7]  
Bovaird Tony., 2007, Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Co-production of Services
[8]  
Boyle D., 2009, CHALLENGES COPRODUCT
[9]   Diversity of self-managed co-housing initiatives in France [J].
Bresson, Sabrina ;
Denefle, Sylvette .
URBAN RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2015, 8 (01) :5-16
[10]  
Cahn E., 2004, No More Throwaway People: The Co-Production Imperative