Floristic diversity, stand structure, and composition 11 years after herbicide site preparation

被引:34
作者
Miller, JH
Boyd, RS
Edwards, MB
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, USDA, So Res Stn, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Dept Bot & Microbiol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, USDA, So Res Stn, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1139/cjfr-29-7-1073
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
This study tested for effects of site preparation herbicides applied at high labeled rates 11 years earlier on plant species richness, diversity, and stand structure and composition. Four study sites in three physiographic provinces were established in central Georgia in 1984. Six herbicide treatments were included on each site: hexazinone liquid, hexazinone pellets, glyphosate, triclopyr, picloram, and a mixture of dicamba and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D). Herbicide and untreated plots were prescribed-burned and planted to loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). Eleven years after treatment, 177 total species were identified in these dense pine plantations; 99 species were forbs and grasses-grasslikes. Treated and check plots did not differ in species richness or diversity. Structurally, the total basal area of the tree canopy was not significantly altered, but the proportion of pine to hardwoods and shrub stem density were influenced by treatment. Latent effects were detected in the abundance and frequency of Pinus taeda, Prunus serotina Ehrh., Quercus stellata Wangenh., Diospyros virginiana L., Vaccinium stamineum L., Vitis rotundifolia Michx., and Lespedeza bicolor Turcz. Most are potential mast producers for wildlife. Herbicide site preparation had little influence on total species numbers or their diversity 11 years after treatment but affected composition by altering perennial species abundance.
引用
收藏
页码:1073 / 1083
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
*AB CONC INC, 1989, SUPERANOVA
[2]  
ALIG RJ, 1990, SE64 USDA FOR SERV
[3]  
BLAKE P M, 1987, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, V11, P176
[4]  
Boyd Robert S., 1995, New Forests, V10, P17
[5]   THE VALUE OF MANAGING FOR BIODIVERSITY [J].
BURTON, PJ ;
BALISKY, AC ;
COWARD, LP ;
CUMMING, SG ;
KNEESHAW, DD .
FORESTRY CHRONICLE, 1992, 68 (02) :225-237
[6]   PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY - ADVANCES IN EVALUATING NATIVE SPECIES FOR REFORESTATION [J].
BUTTERFIELD, RP .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 75 (1-3) :111-121
[7]  
Daugherty, 1991, FOREST REGENERATION, P335, DOI [10.1007/978-94-011-3800-0_19, DOI 10.1007/978-94-011-3800-0_19]
[8]  
Dubois M.R., 1997, FOR LANDOWNER, P7
[9]   Integrating conservation and forestry production: Exploring trade-offs between biodiversity and production in regional land-use assessment [J].
Faith, DP ;
Walker, PA ;
Ive, JR ;
Belbin, L .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 85 (1-3) :251-260
[10]   Implementing biodiversity conservation through the British Columbia forest practices code [J].
Fenger, M .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 85 (1-3) :67-77