A life cycle assessment of options for producing synthetic fuel via pyrolysis

被引:53
|
作者
Vienescu, D. N. [1 ]
Wang, J. [1 ]
Le Gresley, A. [1 ]
Nixon, J. D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kingston Univ, Fac Sci Engn & Comp, Roehampton Vale Campus, London SW15 3DW, England
[2] Coventry Univ, Fac Engn Environm & Comp, Coventry CV1 2JH, W Midlands, England
关键词
Biofuel; Environmental impact; Thermochemical conversion; Bio-oil upgrading; Global warming potential (GWP); Life cycle assessment (LCA); BIO-OIL; CORN STOVER; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOMASS; HYDROTREATMENT; ESTERIFICATION; CATALYSIS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.069
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the sustainability of producing synthetic fuels from biomass using thermochemical processing and different upgrading pathways. Life cycle assessment (LCA) models consisting of biomass collection, transportation, pre-treatment, pyrolysis and upgrading stages were developed. To reveal the environmental impacts associated with greater post-processing to achieve higher quality fuels, six different bio-oil upgrading scenarios were analysed and included esterification, ketonisation, hydrotreating and hydrocracking. Furthermore, to take into account the possible ranges in LCA inventory data, expected, optimistic and pessimistic values for producing and upgrading pyrolysis oils were evaluated. We found that the expected carbon dioxide equivalent emissions could be as high as 6000 gCO(2e)/kg of upgraded fuel, which is greater than the emissions arising from the use of diesel fuel. Other environmental impacts occurring from the fuel production process are outlined, such as resource depletion, acidification and eutrophication.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 634
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Integrated Life Cycle Assessment Modelling of Densified Fuel Production from Various Biomass Species
    Muazu, Rukayya Ibrahim
    Gadkari, Siddharth
    Sadhukhan, Jhuma
    ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (11)
  • [32] Life cycle analysis of fuel production from fast pyrolysis of biomass
    Han, Jeongwoo
    Elgowainy, Amgad
    Dunn, Jennifer B.
    Wang, Michael Q.
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 133 : 421 - 428
  • [33] Life cycle assessment of Jatropha biodiesel as transportation fuel in rural India
    Achten, Wouter M. J.
    Almeida, Joana
    Fobelets, Vincent
    Bolle, Evelien
    Mathijs, Erik
    Singh, Virendra P.
    Tewari, Dina N.
    Verchot, Louis V.
    Muys, Bart
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (12) : 3652 - 3660
  • [34] Clean fuel options with hydrogen for sea transportation: A life cycle approach
    Bicer, Yusuf
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (02) : 1179 - 1193
  • [35] Life-cycle assessment of green biorefinery process options
    Prieler, Manuela
    Lindorfer, Johannes
    Steinmueller, Horst
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2019, 13 (06): : 1391 - 1401
  • [36] Evaluation of fast and slow pyrolysis methods for bio-oil and activated carbon production from eucalyptus wastes using a life cycle assessment approach
    Heidari, Ava
    Khaki, Eshagh
    Younesi, Habibollah
    Lu, Hangyong Ray
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 241
  • [37] Supplying renewable energy for Canadian cement production: Life cycle assessment of bioenergy from forest harvest residues using mobile fast pyrolysis units
    Ayer, Nathan W.
    Dias, Goretty
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 175 : 237 - 250
  • [38] Life-cycle assessment of flash pyrolysis of wood waste
    Zhong, Z. W.
    Song, B.
    Zaki, M. B. M.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2010, 18 (12) : 1177 - 1183
  • [39] Pyrolysis of crayfish waste and life cycle assessment of polygeneration process
    Zhang, Zhichao
    Sui, Haiqing
    Tian, Chao
    Sun, Hao
    Xiong, Wei
    Wang, Lijun
    Wang, Yubo
    Wang, Wenxi
    Lan, Jin
    Deng, Huijing
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, : 2527 - 2540
  • [40] Biomass Pyrolysis for Biochar or Energy Applications? A Life Cycle Assessment
    Peters, Jens F.
    Iribarren, Diego
    Dufour, Javier
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 49 (08) : 5195 - 5202