Effects of Dry Needling and Low-Power Laser for the Treatment of Trigger Points in the Upper Trapezius Muscle: A Randomized Clinical Trial

被引:3
作者
Ansari, Mohammadreza [1 ]
Mahdavi, Sadegh Baradaran [1 ,2 ]
Vahdatpour, Babak [1 ]
Lahijanian, Atieh [1 ]
Khosrawi, Saeid [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Res Inst Primordial Preven t Noncommunicable Dis, Child Growth & Develop ment Res Ctr, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Isfa han Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Hezar Jarib St, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
Dry Needling; Low-Level Light Therapy; Superficial Back Muscles; Myofascial Pain Syndromes; MYOFASCIAL PAIN SYNDROME; ISCHEMIC PRESSURE; DOUBLE-BLIND; NECK PAIN; THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; INTENSITY; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcm.2022.02.013
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of low-power laser therapy, dry needling, and exercise therapy on treating patients with neck and back pain and a diagnosis of the myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle.Methods: A randomized clinical trial was conducted in Isfahan, Iran, in 2019. The study sample (78 participants) was randomly allocated to 3 groups of 26, including stretching exercises (3 times a day for 2 weeks, control group), low -power laser (3 sessions for 2 weeks, 6 J/cm2, mean power of 100 MW in each point), and dry needling (4 sessions, with 25 pound 0.25-mm needles). For all patients, the visual analog scale (VAS), neck disability index (NDI), and shoulder pain and disability index (SPDI) were completed at baseline, immediately, and 1 month after treatment.Results: Final participants in this study (n = 60) consisted of 33 (55%) female patients and 27 (45%) male patients, with a mean age of 51.25 </n> 7.94 years. In the exercise group, VAS, NDI, and SPDI scores were not remarkably different in the studied periods (P > .05). Moreover, a notable decrease in VAS, NDI, and SPDI scores were observed in the treatment intervals. However, by excluding the effect of the control group, no substantial difference was observed between the 2 treatments (P > .05).Conclusion: The use of laser therapy and dry needling methods induced a rapid response to pain relief. There was no difference between the 2 forms of treatment in the short term. (J Chiropr Med 2022;21;288-295)
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 295
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Aghaei B., 2014, Iran Quart J Breast Dis, V7, P16
[2]  
Agung I, 2018, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, V1073
[3]   Investigation of the effect of GaAs laser therapy on cervical myofascial pain syndrome [J].
Altan, L ;
Bingöl, U ;
Aykaç, M ;
Yurtkuran, M .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 25 (01) :23-27
[4]  
Carlsson Christer, 2002, Acupunct Med, V20, P82
[5]   Evaluation of Low Intensity Laser Therapy In Myofascial Pain Syndrome [J].
Carrasco, Thaise Graciele ;
Carrasco Guerisoli, Laise Daniela ;
Zanello Guerisoli, Danilo Mathias ;
Mazzetto, Marcelo Oliveira .
CRANIO-THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR & SLEEP PRACTICE, 2009, 27 (04) :243-247
[6]   Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in the management of neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised placebo or active-treatment controlled trials [J].
Chow, Roberta T. ;
Johnson, Mark I. ;
Lopes-Martins, Rodrigo A. B. ;
Bjordal, Jan M. .
LANCET, 2009, 374 (9705) :1897-1908
[7]  
Cifu D.X., 2015, Braddom's Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
[8]  
Damian M, 2011, MED PROBL PERFORM AR, V26, P211
[9]   A critical overview of the current myofascial pain literature - October 2015 [J].
Dommerholt, Jan ;
Grieve, Rob ;
Hooks, Todd ;
Layton, Michelle .
JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2015, 19 (04) :736-746
[10]   The effect of gallium arsenide aluminum laser therapy in the management of cervical myofascial pain syndrome: a double blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Dundar, U. ;
Evcik, D. ;
Samli, F. ;
Pusak, H. ;
Kavuncu, V. .
CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 26 (06) :930-934